doc: Create 2020-01-06.md

Fixes: nodejs#460
PR-URL: nodejs#461
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>

wg-meetings/2020-01-06.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# Node.js  Diagnostics WorkGroup Meeting 2021-01-06
+
+## Links
+
+* **Recording**:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPiD0OchmpA
+* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qCrsUxc5sqXczKxVE1tWmf_LR2Ci0llNQ-HzDTTMnAU/edit
+
+## Present
+
+* Stephen Belanger (@qard)
+* Michael Dawson (@mhdawson)
+* Rafael Gonzaga (@rafaelgss)
+* Mary Marchini (@mmarchini)
+
+
+## Agenda
+
+## Announcements
+
+*Extracted from **diag-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+* No announcements this week.
+
+### nodejs/node
+
+* async_hooks: use new v8::Context PromiseHook API [#36394](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36394)
+  * good progress, just a few last changes that Stephen will tackle soon and looks like it should land.
+
+### nodejs/diagnostics
+
+* Discussion: Move node-inspect into core? [#459](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/459)
+  * Mary: summary of the issues (confusion, code getting out of sync, inconsistent publish to npm, lack of maintainers, etc.)
+  * Mary: should we move to core? Consensus seems to be so
+  * Mary: will open an issue to make sure there are no objections from Diagnostics team
+* Identify async_hooks use cases beyond AsyncLocalStorage [#437](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/437)
+  * Stephen: trying to identify path forward with async hooks
+    * In it’s current form it shouldn’t be considered stable (exposes internals)
+    * Should we be layering stuff on top of async_hooks?
+    * Or try to eliminate bits that are unsafe?
+    * etc. etc.
+    * To reach a decision we need to identify async_hooks use cases
+    * Michael: should we do a survey?
+    * Mary: maybe a freeform survey, one/two multiple choice questions + a text field where folks can describe their use cases
+    * Stephen: already gathered some use cases and found particular needs
+    * Mary: will create a PR with draft survey so we can iterate on it
+    * Mary: should we create a new issue?
+    * (no strong opinions either way)
+
+* https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11893
+  * Rafael: should we implement the blackbox on Chrome DevTools or Node.js internal?
+  * Mary: not sure if there will be pushback from DevTools to that change, other than that implementing on DevTools seems like a good idea
+  * Michael: DevTools is a good idea if the blackbox rules won’t change
+  * Mary: they shouldn’t :fingers-crossed:
+  * Rafael: maybe we can implement on node-inspect first, and then propose to DevTools?
+  * Mary and Michael: sgtm
+
+## Q&A, Other
+
+## Upcoming Meetings
+
+* **Node.js Foundation Calendar**: https://nodejs.org/calendar
+
+Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar.