-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Git Gui Error: explorer.exe not found in PATH #4356
Git Gui Error: explorer.exe not found in PATH #4356
Comments
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes git-for-windows/git#4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes git-for-windows#4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
@deanwiles could you edit |
I had the same issue, and the suggested fix worked for me. |
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
/add relnote bug Git GUI's The workflow run was started |
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Git GUI's `Repository>Explore Working Copy` [was broken since v2.39.1](git-for-windows/git#4356), which has been fixed. Signed-off-by: gitforwindowshelper[bot] <gitforwindowshelper-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
@Hattes @deanwiles please note that the latest snapshot has the fix. Git for Windows' snapshots are identical to full releases except for the funny-looking version number. In all other respects, I consider snapshots like "micro releases", as I aim to keep the main branch in an always-releasable state. So maybe you want to run with the latest snapshot until the next full Git for Windows version is released? |
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes git-for-windows#4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes git-for-windows#4356
Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a companion PR of prati0100/git-gui#95 Since Git v2.39.1, we are a bit more stringent in searching the PATH. In particular, we specifically require the `.exe` suffix. However, the `Repository>Explore Working Copy` command asks for `explorer.exe` to be found on the `PATH`, which _already_ has that suffix. Let's unstartle the PATH-finding logic about this scenario. This fixes #4356
Setup
64-bit
64-bit
defaults?
to the issue you're seeing?
Details
Git Gui
Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
this will help us understand the issue.
Windows Explorer used to open showing the repository root directory and files.
This error dialog was displayed:
Expanding the Details>> shows:
URL to that repository to help us with testing?
Error occurs with multiple repositories.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: