Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
pack-objects: thread the path-based compression
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Adapting the implementation of ll_find_deltas(), create a threaded
version of the --path-walk compression step in 'git pack-objects'.

This involves adding a 'regions' member to the thread_params struct,
allowing each thread to own a section of paths. We can simplify the way
jobs are split because there is no value in extending the batch based on
name-hash the way sections of the object entry array are attempted to be
grouped. We re-use the 'list_size' and 'remaining' items for the purpose
of borrowing work in progress from other "victim" threads when a thread
has finished its batch of work more quickly.

Using the Git repository as a test repo, the p5313 performance test
shows that the resulting size of the repo is the same, but the threaded
implementation gives gains of varying degrees depending on the number of
objects being packed. (This was tested on a 16-core machine.)

Test                                      HEAD~1    HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack                           0.01    0.01  +0.0%
5313.4: thin pack with --path-walk          0.01    0.01  +0.0%
5313.6: big pack                            2.54    2.60  +2.4%
5313.8: big pack with --path-walk           4.70    3.09 -34.3%
5313.10: repack                            28.75   28.55  -0.7%
5313.12: repack with --path-walk          108.55   46.14 -57.5%

On the microsoft/fluentui repo, where the --path-walk feature has been
shown to be more effective in space savings, we get these results:

Test                                     HEAD~1    HEAD
----------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack                         0.39     0.40  +2.6%
5313.4: thin pack with --path-walk        0.08     0.07 -12.5%
5313.6: big pack                          4.15     4.15  +0.0%
5313.8: big pack with --path-walk         6.41     3.21 -49.9%
5313.10: repack                          90.69    90.83  +0.2%
5313.12: repack with --path-walk        108.23    49.09 -54.6%

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
  • Loading branch information
derrickstolee committed Oct 8, 2024
1 parent c3f24dc commit 264affb
Showing 1 changed file with 160 additions and 2 deletions.
162 changes: 160 additions & 2 deletions builtin/pack-objects.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2935,6 +2935,7 @@ static void find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned *list_size,
struct thread_params {
pthread_t thread;
struct object_entry **list;
struct packing_region *regions;
unsigned list_size;
unsigned remaining;
int window;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3248,6 +3249,163 @@ static void find_deltas_by_region(struct object_entry *list,
stop_progress(&progress_state);
}

static void *threaded_find_deltas_by_path(void *arg)
{
struct thread_params *me = arg;

progress_lock();
while (me->remaining) {
while (me->remaining) {
progress_unlock();
find_deltas_for_region(to_pack.objects,
me->regions,
me->processed);
progress_lock();
me->remaining--;
me->regions++;
}

me->working = 0;
pthread_cond_signal(&progress_cond);
progress_unlock();

/*
* We must not set ->data_ready before we wait on the
* condition because the main thread may have set it to 1
* before we get here. In order to be sure that new
* work is available if we see 1 in ->data_ready, it
* was initialized to 0 before this thread was spawned
* and we reset it to 0 right away.
*/
pthread_mutex_lock(&me->mutex);
while (!me->data_ready)
pthread_cond_wait(&me->cond, &me->mutex);
me->data_ready = 0;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&me->mutex);

progress_lock();
}
progress_unlock();
/* leave ->working 1 so that this doesn't get more work assigned */
return NULL;
}

static void ll_find_deltas_by_region(struct object_entry *list,
struct packing_region *regions,
uint32_t start, uint32_t nr)
{
struct thread_params *p;
int i, ret, active_threads = 0;
unsigned int processed = 0;
uint32_t progress_nr;
init_threaded_search();

if (!nr)
return;

progress_nr = regions[nr - 1].start + regions[nr - 1].nr;
if (delta_search_threads <= 1) {
find_deltas_by_region(list, regions, start, nr);
cleanup_threaded_search();
return;
}

if (progress > pack_to_stdout)
fprintf_ln(stderr, _("Path-based delta compression using up to %d threads"),
delta_search_threads);
CALLOC_ARRAY(p, delta_search_threads);

if (progress)
progress_state = start_progress(_("Compressing objects by path"),
progress_nr);
/* Partition the work amongst work threads. */
for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++) {
unsigned sub_size = nr / (delta_search_threads - i);

p[i].window = window;
p[i].depth = depth;
p[i].processed = &processed;
p[i].working = 1;
p[i].data_ready = 0;

p[i].regions = regions;
p[i].list_size = sub_size;
p[i].remaining = sub_size;

regions += sub_size;
nr -= sub_size;
}

/* Start work threads. */
for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++) {
if (!p[i].list_size)
continue;
pthread_mutex_init(&p[i].mutex, NULL);
pthread_cond_init(&p[i].cond, NULL);
ret = pthread_create(&p[i].thread, NULL,
threaded_find_deltas_by_path, &p[i]);
if (ret)
die(_("unable to create thread: %s"), strerror(ret));
active_threads++;
}

/*
* Now let's wait for work completion. Each time a thread is done
* with its work, we steal half of the remaining work from the
* thread with the largest number of unprocessed objects and give
* it to that newly idle thread. This ensure good load balancing
* until the remaining object list segments are simply too short
* to be worth splitting anymore.
*/
while (active_threads) {
struct thread_params *target = NULL;
struct thread_params *victim = NULL;
unsigned sub_size = 0;

progress_lock();
for (;;) {
for (i = 0; !target && i < delta_search_threads; i++)
if (!p[i].working)
target = &p[i];
if (target)
break;
pthread_cond_wait(&progress_cond, &progress_mutex);
}

for (i = 0; i < delta_search_threads; i++)
if (p[i].remaining > 2*window &&
(!victim || victim->remaining < p[i].remaining))
victim = &p[i];
if (victim) {
sub_size = victim->remaining / 2;
target->regions = victim->regions + victim->remaining - sub_size;
victim->list_size -= sub_size;
victim->remaining -= sub_size;
}
target->list_size = sub_size;
target->remaining = sub_size;
target->working = 1;
progress_unlock();

pthread_mutex_lock(&target->mutex);
target->data_ready = 1;
pthread_cond_signal(&target->cond);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&target->mutex);

if (!sub_size) {
pthread_join(target->thread, NULL);
pthread_cond_destroy(&target->cond);
pthread_mutex_destroy(&target->mutex);
active_threads--;
}
}
cleanup_threaded_search();
free(p);

display_progress(progress_state, progress_nr);
stop_progress(&progress_state);
}

static void prepare_pack(int window, int depth)
{
struct object_entry **delta_list;
Expand All @@ -3273,8 +3431,8 @@ static void prepare_pack(int window, int depth)
return;

if (path_walk)
find_deltas_by_region(to_pack.objects, to_pack.regions,
0, to_pack.nr_regions);
ll_find_deltas_by_region(to_pack.objects, to_pack.regions,
0, to_pack.nr_regions);

ALLOC_ARRAY(delta_list, to_pack.nr_objects);
nr_deltas = n = 0;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 264affb

Please sign in to comment.