[GHSA-mmwx-rj87-vfgr] DNSJava affected by KeyTrap - NSEC3 closest encloser proof can exhaust CPU resources

[amita-seal]

Updates

• Affected products

Comments
Based on dnsjava/dnsjava@711af79
Vulnerability is irrelevant to the origin version, the entire fix is in dnssec folder, which was only added in version 3.5, as per changelog

[github]

Hi there @ibauersachs! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

[darakian]

same comment as #4787

[amita-seal]

@darakian yes, you got the links correct.
Are @ibauersachs 's answers on #4787 enough to merge this change too?

Thanks for your response.

[darakian]

@amita-seal I think the only outstanding question is if we should include org.jitsi:dnssecjava as an affected artifact on this advisory as well. @ibauersachs thoughts?

[ibauersachs]

Yes, this issue affects both libraries equally.

[advisory-database]

Hi @amita-seal! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

[darakian]

Awesome. Thanks for the clarity 👍
org.jitsi:dnssecjava is on there with the same vulnerable version range as the other PR