-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge main into v1 #899
Merged
Merged
Merge main into v1 #899
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
And add a better error message. By using `void` instead of `await`, any error thrown is not caught by surrounding try-catch blocks. I could continue to use `void` and explicitly handle any thrown errors by using `.catch`, but most likely the time savings is minimal and this makes the code more complex.
Discussion here #882 (comment) shows that properly handling preloading feature flag errors is complex and the benefit we get from it does not offset the complexity.
Mergeback v1.0.30 refs/heads/v1 into main
Bumps [node-fetch](https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch) from 2.6.1 to 2.6.7. - [Release notes](https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/blob/main/docs/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](node-fetch/node-fetch@v2.6.1...v2.6.7) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: node-fetch dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
The `useUploadDomain` approach is now fully enabled
Ensure loadApiError is caught
…essage Remove `experimental` warning message for custom packs
Remove old upload path
…ction into rneatherway/content-type
Set contentType for database uploads
…de-fetch-2.6.7 Bump node-fetch from 2.6.1 to 2.6.7 in /runner
Bumps [node-fetch](https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch) from 2.6.1 to 2.6.7. - [Release notes](https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/releases) - [Commits](node-fetch/node-fetch@v2.6.1...v2.6.7) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: node-fetch dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Bumps [sinon](https://github.com/sinonjs/sinon) from 11.1.2 to 13.0.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/sinonjs/sinon/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/sinonjs/sinon/blob/master/docs/changelog.md) - [Commits](sinonjs/sinon@v11.1.2...v13.0.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: sinon dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Bump sinon from 11.1.2 to 13.0.0
…h-2.6.7 Bump node-fetch from 2.6.1 to 2.6.7
PR looks good. |
aeisenberg
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Merging 3a741b6 into v1
Conductor for this PR is @henrymercer
Contains the following pull requests:
experimental
warning message for custom packs #888 - Removeexperimental
warning message for custom packs (@aeisenberg)Please review the following: