Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wire up data flow paths view #2182

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 17, 2023
Merged

Wire up data flow paths view #2182

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 17, 2023

Conversation

charisk
Copy link
Contributor

@charisk charisk commented Mar 17, 2023

Changes the UX around data flow paths so that they're showed in a new tab, rather than a full screen modal.

Screen.Recording.2023-03-17.at.08.51.20.mov

The CodePaths can now potentially be simplified/removed but I've left that for a future PR/issue.

Checklist

  • CHANGELOG.md has been updated to incorporate all user visible changes made by this pull request.
  • Issues have been created for any UI or other user-facing changes made by this pull request.
  • [Maintainers only] If this pull request makes user-facing changes that require documentation changes, open a corresponding docs pull request in the github/codeql repo and add the ready-for-doc-review label there.

@charisk charisk added the secexp label Mar 17, 2023
@charisk charisk requested review from a team as code owners March 17, 2023 09:32
Copy link
Member

@koesie10 koesie10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I only have some minor suggestions

I think we can also remove the ThemeProvider from the CodePaths.stories.tsx file. Removing all @primer packages can probably best be done in a follow-up PR.

@charisk charisk merged commit 7914403 into main Mar 17, 2023
@charisk charisk deleted the charisk/wire-up-data-flow-paths branch March 17, 2023 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants