-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HTML base tag #166
Comments
Wow, that's new to me too. No, Proofer doesn't handle this yet...but it should. |
The base tag is not widely used. Bertrand, can you provide a public website made by you with the base tag? |
Hi Anatole, I am using for a corporate website that I would not like to advertise here, but basically any website that is sitting in a subdirectory could use the For instance if you are building a blog on your domain name 'http://hello.me/blog/2010-03-10-my-blog-post.html', I think you are better off setting Am I making sense ? Regardless of that, shouldn't the fact that it exists in the standard be enough to make its implementation worthwhile ? PS : Of course, I would have used subdomains if I could. |
@bertrand-caron Do you know another corporate website which uses the base tag? The base tag is not popular because it’s prepended to every relative link. If for example my assets sit in the
Not necessarily. Proofer is not an academic project, it focuses on real-world issues. |
We use the base tag on e.g. http://www.interballoon.com/cgi-bin/order.pl and http://www.interrose.co.uk/flowers/20_pink_freesias.shtml as it allows us to keep using relative links to the files in the root directory, even though the current page is being served from a subdirectory. It means the page in the subdirectory doesn't have to get cluttered with '../' everywhere. |
Hi,
I have not yet come up with a test for it, but I have the feeling html-proofer does not implement the HTML base tag.
I myself only discovered the existence of the tag recently, which is really useful for not hardcoding too much in your site's URL.
Do you want to comment on that ?
Cheers, B.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: