Check in parser if the source has stable IDs and if not, delete the existing cases

[iamleeg]

Mostly putting this up as draft now as it's the easiest way to get the dockerised tests to run, which are the only way to test the function I need to change.

#1921

[abhidg]

Looks good, other than the default for hasStableIdentifiers which should be False as that's the case for majority. If a source actually has stable identifiers with hasStableIdentifiers, we are going to ingest the entire dataset needlessly, but it won't have incorrect data.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1950 (20198ab) into main (0bc1a9e) will decrease coverage by 10.38%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1950       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   66.63%   56.25%   -10.39%     
===========================================
  Files         132       76       -56     
  Lines        4466     2622     -1844     
  Branches     1174      837      -337     
===========================================
- Hits         2976     1475     -1501     
+ Misses       1490     1147      -343     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...-service/ui/src/components/AutomatedSourceForm.tsx	44.00% <ø> (ø)
.../curator-service/ui/src/components/SourceTable.tsx	62.58% <100.00%> (ø)
...fication/curator-service/api/src/model/schedule.ts
data-serving/data-service/src/model/travel.ts
...rving/data-service/src/geocoding/remoteGeocoder.ts
...a-serving/data-service/src/model/travel-history.ts
...rification/curator-service/api/src/model/origin.ts
data-serving/data-service/src/util/search.ts
...ion/curator-service/api/src/controllers/uploads.ts
...-serving/data-service/src/model/genome-sequence.ts
... and 48 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0bc1a9e...20198ab. Read the comment docs.

[abhidg]

Is this part of another PR? Seems to be from the highlighting search terms work.

[iamleeg]

You know what? I don't know. I didn't explicitly put this here, I ran npm i to ensure the deps were up to date and I committed the change to the lock file. I can't find react-beautiful-dnd in the package.json so I can revert this file if you think it's wrong.

[abhidg]

Right, so the highlighting work seems to be already in main, which would explain this. I'm fine with keeping this change.

verification/curator-service/ui/src/components/ViewCase.tsx
30:import Highlighter from 'react-highlight-words'

[abhidg]

Right, so the highlighting work seems to be already in main, which would explain this. I'm fine with keeping this change.

verification/curator-service/ui/src/components/ViewCase.tsx
30:import Highlighter from 'react-highlight-words'