Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
chore: remove reviewers checklist from PR template
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Wasn’t used.

Could make sense to keep the main description for the contributors. While having the reviewers checklist posted as a comment by a bot.
  • Loading branch information
moul authored Jul 21, 2023
1 parent 346359e commit 04df502
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 6 deletions.
6 changes: 0 additions & 6 deletions .github/pull_request_template.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,10 +11,4 @@ Please provide a detailed description of the changes made in this pull request.
- [ ] Added references to related issues and PRs
- [ ] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
- [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](../.benchmarks/README.md).

## Maintainers Checklist

- [ ] Checked that the author followed the guidelines in `CONTRIBUTING.md`
- [ ] Checked the conventional-commit (especially PR title and verb, presence of `BREAKING CHANGE:` in the body)
- [ ] Ensured that this PR is not a significant change or confirmed that the review/consideration process was appropriate for the change
</details>

0 comments on commit 04df502

Please sign in to comment.