feat(paginate): re-open PR with #883's work

[Doozers]

Contributors' checklist...

• Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
• Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
• Updated the official documentation or not needed
• No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
• Added references to related issues and PRs
• Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
• Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

[Doozers]

Hi @tbruyelle tried to modify the previous PR's target branch via github but this created a strange merge commit so as mentionned by @thehowl I will continue here

[tbruyelle]

I think it would be better to migrate your p/demo/md package into /p/demo/ui.

• md.Link can be removed because it already exists as ui.Link
• md.EscMDURL should be turned into a private function in p/demo/ui and used internally in ui.Link.Render().

[tbruyelle]

Hi @tbruyelle tried to modify the previous PR's target branch via github but this created a strange merge commit so as mentionned by @thehowl I will continue here

Let's close the previous PR then.

[Doozers]

I think it would be better to migrate your p/demo/md package into /p/demo/ui.

• md.Link can be removed because it already exists as ui.Link
• md.EscMDURL should be turned into a private function in p/demo/ui and used internally in ui.Link.Render().

yes better this way 👍

[tbruyelle]

LGTM

[jefft0]

Hello @Doozers . There is a new PR for pagination from moul. #2584 . Do you want to close this PR in favor of that one?

[jefft0]

Hello @tbruyelle . You approved this pagination PR a year ago. Now there is a new PR from moul with two approvals. #2584 . Should this PR be closed in favor of the new one?

[tbruyelle]

Hello @tbruyelle . You approved this pagination PR a year ago. Now there is a new PR from moul with two approvals. #2584 . Should this PR be closed in favor of the new one?

Well, tbh, right now I don't have the time to dive into this code a year after I first looked at it, but I trust that moul has done a better job, so yeah, let's close this PR.