Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: improve gnovm/pkg/gnolang.TestPrecompile() #1659

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

tbruyelle
Copy link
Contributor

@tbruyelle tbruyelle commented Feb 15, 2024

This test actually only tested the private precompileAST() function, not the public Precompile() function.

The change makes it call the public function and adds some more cases described in comments like:

  • unknow-realm (no error)
  • syntax error
  • blacklist (was already done)
  • multiple files (not possible, Precompile() is single file only)

Also used multiple-line string for file and expected content, for better readability.

Relates to #1636

The test can be run with

go test ./gnovm/pkg/gnolang/ -v -run Precompile
Contributors' checklist...
  • Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
  • Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
  • Updated the official documentation or not needed
  • No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
  • Added references to related issues and PRs
  • Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
  • Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

This test actually only tested the private `precompileAST` function,
not the public `Precompile` function.

The change makes it call the public function and adds some more cases
described in comments like:
- unknow-realm (no error)
- syntax error
- blacklist (was already done)
- multiple files (not possible, `Precompile` is single file only)

Also used multiple-line string for file and expected content, for better
readability.

Relates to gnolang#1636
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 📦 🤖 gnovm Issues or PRs gnovm related label Feb 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6fb3317) 56.17% compared to head (54b9a47) 55.12%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1659      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.17%   55.12%   -1.05%     
==========================================
  Files         439      447       +8     
  Lines       66247    67917    +1670     
==========================================
+ Hits        37214    37439     +225     
- Misses      26143    27563    +1420     
- Partials     2890     2915      +25     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-1.22.x ∅ <ø> (?)
misc ∅ <ø> (∅)
misc-_test.genstd ∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

gnovm/pkg/gnolang/precompile_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@thehowl thehowl merged commit ee0880b into gnolang:master Feb 16, 2024
188 of 189 checks passed
@tbruyelle tbruyelle deleted the tbruyelle/test/precompile branch February 22, 2024 12:19
leohhhn pushed a commit to leohhhn/gno that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
This test actually only tested the private `precompileAST()` function,
not the public `Precompile()` function.

The change makes it call the public function and adds some more cases
described in comments like:
- unknow-realm (no error)
- syntax error
- blacklist (was already done)
- multiple files (not possible, `Precompile()` is single file only)

Also used multiple-line string for file and expected content, for better
readability.

Relates to gnolang#1636

The test can be run with 
```
go test ./gnovm/pkg/gnolang/ -v -run Precompile
```

<!-- please provide a detailed description of the changes made in this
pull request. -->

<details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary>

- [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
- [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is
self-explanatory
- [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed
- [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message
was included in the description
- [ ] Added references to related issues and PRs
- [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
- [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated
graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info
[here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md).
</details>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📦 🤖 gnovm Issues or PRs gnovm related
Projects
Status: Done
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants