fix(gnovm): correct type comparison for bool type

[ltzmaxwell]

This closes #2719.

copy from #2719:

#1890 introduced strict type comparison, which is the correct approach but overlooked the problem mentioned above, resulting in the comparison between bool and untyped bool. I will provide a fix soon.

Contributors' checklist...

• Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
• Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
• Updated the official documentation or not needed
• No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
• Added references to related issues and PRs
• Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
• Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.21%. Comparing base (aae5d49) to head (60b6697).
Report is 19 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2725      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.23%   60.21%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         562      562              
  Lines       75091    75028      -63     
==========================================
- Hits        45228    45181      -47     
+ Misses      26482    26474       -8     
+ Partials     3381     3373       -8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
contribs/gnodev	61.40% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnofaucet	14.46% <ø> (ø)
gno.land	64.61% <ø> (-0.16%)	⬇️
gnovm	64.33% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
misc/genstd	80.54% <ø> (ø)
misc/logos	20.23% <ø> (ø)
tm2	62.01% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[deelawn]

Looks good. Left one suggestion.

[notJoon]

It runs very well. nice 👍

[r3v4s]

test runs well :D