fix: Don't emit events from failed transactions #2806
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
deelawn
requested review from
jaekwon,
moul,
piux2 and
zivkovicmilos
as code owners
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2806 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 60.44% 60.78% +0.34%
==========================================
Files 563 563
Lines 75157 75729 +572
==========================================
+ Hits 45426 46032 +606
+ Misses 26341 26298 -43
- Partials 3390 3399 +9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
moul
reviewed
Sep 17, 2024
moul
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2024
thehowl
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2024
petar-dambovaliev
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed that we emit events from the VM even when a transaction fails. This is very difficult to write tests for because we don't display events when a transaction fails, but I was able to verify the following behavior BEFORE this fix:
r/sys/validatorswill be processed and the state updated as normal, even if the transaction that emitted them failsCorrect me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we want to persist or take any other actions on events sourced from failing transactions.
I'm open to suggestions on how to write tests for this, but the fix should be self-explanatory.
Contributors' checklist...
BREAKING CHANGE: xxxmessage was included in the description