-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Send commit object in http response header for archives #17923
Send commit object in http response header for archives #17923
Conversation
You need to run make fmt |
Why not just send the sha instead? |
// We use base64 to ensure a lossless encoding of binary data. | ||
// test: gitea/integrations/repo_download_test.go | ||
func addCommitObjectResponseHeader(ctx *context.Context, archiver *repo_model.RepoArchiver) { | ||
if ctx.Req.Header.Get("X-Commit-Object") != "1" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using X-Commit-Object
for different purpose in request and response is not a good idea.
HTTP has Content-Length
in request and response, it has the same meaning.
But now the X-Commit-Object
is used for different meaning. I think we can make it like this:
request:
X-Request-Extra-Info: commit-id
response:
X-Extra-Commit-ID: .....
If we want to add more options, we can extend: X-Request-Extra-Info: commit-message, commit-author
...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is not a good idea
why not?
If we want to add more options
then we can add more headers
keep it simple : )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not?
As explained, the X-Commit-Object
has different meanings, will mislead users and developers.
keep it simple : )
I don't think X-Request-Extra-Info
+ X-Extra-Commit-ID
is more complex than X-Commit-Object
+ X-Commit-Object
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for your opinion, but youre just wasting my time. bye : )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unresolve
its interesting that bad taste and hostage-taking so often appear together.
probably both are facets of the same personality type (conservative)
in the real world, i would kill the tyrant, and install someone who is "less bad".
in the digital world? lets just pretend this never happened ... "muh ideals!"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unresolve
its interesting that bad taste and hostage-taking so often appear together.
probably both are facets of the same personality type (conservative)
in the real world, i would kill the tyrant, and install someone who is "less bad".
in the digital world? lets just pretend this never happened ... "muh ideals!"
Are you talking about yourself?
For me, I feel fine. I submitted some PRs, approved many PRs and helped some contributors to improve their PRs, like #17152
, #17900
, #17929
, etc.
If you don't like my suggestions, that's your choice. I won't waste time on non-sense communications.
We can keep this review open and let everyone read it.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 months. Thank you for your contributions. |
It has been stale for long time and doesn't get interest or update. I will close it. You are always welcome if there could be a open and friendly discussion. |
fix #17834
demo