Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disallow merge when required checked are missing #29143

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

MarkusAmshove
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #21892

This PR disallows merging a PR when not all commit status contexts configured in the branch protection are met.

Previously, the PR was happy to merge when one commit status was successful and the other contexts weren't reported.

Any feedback is welcome, first time Go :-)
I'm also not sure if the changes in the template break something else

Given the following branch protection:

branch_protection

This was shown before the change:

before

With the change, it is now shown as this:

after

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 12, 2024
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 12, 2024
@MarkusAmshove MarkusAmshove changed the title Disallow merge when not all required contexts are matched Disallow merge when required checked are missing Feb 12, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 16, 2024
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Feb 16, 2024
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 16, 2024
@delvh delvh added the topic/pr Issues related to pull requests label Feb 16, 2024
@lunny lunny added the backport/v1.21 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.21 label Feb 17, 2024
routers/web/repo/pull.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lunny
lunny previously requested changes Feb 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged and removed lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. labels Feb 17, 2024
@MarkusAmshove
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarkusAmshove commented Feb 17, 2024

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged labels Feb 18, 2024
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 19, 2024
@lunny lunny enabled auto-merge (squash) February 19, 2024 09:20
@lunny lunny merged commit a11ccc9 into go-gitea:main Feb 19, 2024
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot
Copy link
Contributor

I was unable to create a backport for 1.21. @MarkusAmshove, please send one manually. 🍵

go run ./contrib/backport 29143
...  // fix git conflicts if any
go run ./contrib/backport --continue

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added backport/manual No power to the bots! Create your backport yourself! and removed reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. labels Feb 19, 2024
MarkusAmshove added a commit to MarkusAmshove/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
fixes go-gitea#21892

This PR disallows merging a PR when not all commit status contexts
configured in the branch protection are met.

Previously, the PR was happy to merge when one commit status was
successful and the other contexts weren't reported.

Any feedback is welcome, first time Go :-)
I'm also not sure if the changes in the template break something else

Given the following branch protection:

![branch_protection](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/f871b4e4-138b-435a-b496-f9ad432e3dec)

This was shown before the change:

![before](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/60424ff0-ee09-4fa0-856e-64e6e3fb0612)

With the change, it is now shown as this:

![after](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/4e464142-efb1-4889-8166-eb3be26c8f3d)

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
lafriks pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
backport #29143

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
silverwind pushed a commit to silverwind/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
fixes go-gitea#21892 

This PR disallows merging a PR when not all commit status contexts
configured in the branch protection are met.

Previously, the PR was happy to merge when one commit status was
successful and the other contexts weren't reported.

Any feedback is welcome, first time Go :-)
I'm also not sure if the changes in the template break something else

Given the following branch protection:


![branch_protection](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/f871b4e4-138b-435a-b496-f9ad432e3dec)

This was shown before the change:


![before](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/60424ff0-ee09-4fa0-856e-64e6e3fb0612)

With the change, it is now shown as this:


![after](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/4e464142-efb1-4889-8166-eb3be26c8f3d)

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Feb 21, 2024
6543 pushed a commit to 6543-forks/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
fixes go-gitea#21892

This PR disallows merging a PR when not all commit status contexts
configured in the branch protection are met.

Previously, the PR was happy to merge when one commit status was
successful and the other contexts weren't reported.

Any feedback is welcome, first time Go :-)
I'm also not sure if the changes in the template break something else

Given the following branch protection:

![branch_protection](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/f871b4e4-138b-435a-b496-f9ad432e3dec)

This was shown before the change:

![before](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/60424ff0-ee09-4fa0-856e-64e6e3fb0612)

With the change, it is now shown as this:

![after](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2401875/4e464142-efb1-4889-8166-eb3be26c8f3d)

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a11ccc9)
Copy link

Automatically locked because of our CONTRIBUTING guidelines

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created backport/manual No power to the bots! Create your backport yourself! backport/v1.21 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.21 lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. topic/pr Issues related to pull requests type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Show required commit status which haven’t been done yet
6 participants