Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Refactor webhooks #8963

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Nov 13, 2019

This PR creates a new interface named WebhookType. All webhook types should implement it.

  • Webhook types could be customerized on app.ini

@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Nov 13, 2019
@lunny lunny changed the title Refactor webhooks WIP: Refactor webhooks Nov 13, 2019
@lunny lunny force-pushed the lunny/refactor_webhook branch from 8e8220a to c772844 Compare November 15, 2019 15:09
@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Dec 28, 2019

looks interesting ...

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Dec 28, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 27, 2020

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 months. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 27, 2020

This pull request has been automatically closed because of inactivity. You can re-open it if needed.

@stale stale bot closed this Apr 27, 2020
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/refactor_webhook branch November 18, 2020 04:36
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
issue/stale lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants