document slog support in logr package

The old API isn't going away, so the matching functions cross-reference each
other.

README.md

@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ logr design but also left out some parts and changed others:
 The high-level slog API is explicitly meant to be one of many different APIs
 that can be layered on top of a shared `slog.Handler`. logr is one such
 alternative API, with [interoperability](#slog-interoperability) provided by the [`slogr`](slogr)
+package and (since 1.4.0) by corresponding functionality in the main `logr`
 package.
 
 ### Inspiration
@@ -145,11 +146,12 @@ There are implementations for the following logging libraries:
 ## slog interoperability
 
 Interoperability goes both ways, using the `logr.Logger` API with a `slog.Handler`
-and using the `slog.Logger` API with a `logr.LogSink`. [slogr](./slogr) provides `NewLogr` and
-`NewSlogHandler` API calls to convert between a `logr.Logger` and a `slog.Handler`.
+and using the `slog.Logger` API with a `logr.LogSink`. [slogr](./slogr) provides `NewLogr` (= `logr.NewFromSlogHandler`) and
+`NewSlogHandler` (= `logr.NewSlogHandler`) API calls to convert between a `logr.Logger` and a `slog.Handler`.
 As usual, `slog.New` can be used to wrap such a `slog.Handler` in the high-level
 slog API. `slogr` itself leaves that to the caller.
 
+
 ## Using a `logr.Sink` as backend for slog
 
 Ideally, a logr sink implementation should support both logr and slog by

slogr.go

@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ import (
 //
 // The logr verbosity level is mapped to slog levels such that V(0) becomes
 // slog.LevelInfo and V(4) becomes slog.LevelDebug.
+//
+// NewFromSlogHandler is identical to [slogr.NewLogr]. Either of these can be used.
 func NewFromSlogHandler(handler slog.Handler) Logger {
 	if handler, ok := handler.(*slogHandler); ok {
 		if handler.sink == nil {
@@ -56,6 +58,8 @@ func NewFromSlogHandler(handler slog.Handler) Logger {
 //	slog.New(NewSlogHandler(logger)).Warning(...) -> logger.GetSink().Info(level=0, ...)
 //	slog.New(NewSlogHandler(logger)).Info(...) -> logger.GetSink().Info(level=0, ...)
 //	slog.New(NewSlogHandler(logger.V(4))).Info(...) -> logger.GetSink().Info(level=4, ...)
+//
+// NewSlogHandler is identical to [slogr.NewSlogHandler]. Either of these can be used.
 func NewSlogHandler(logger Logger) slog.Handler {
 	if sink, ok := logger.GetSink().(*slogSink); ok && logger.GetV() == 0 {
 		return sink.handler
@@ -91,6 +95,8 @@ func NewSlogHandler(logger Logger) slog.Handler {
 // An implementation could support both interfaces in two different types, but then
 // additional interfaces would be needed to convert between those types in NewLogr
 // and NewSlogHandler.
+//
+// SlogSink is identical to [slogr.SlogSink]. Either of these can be used.
 type SlogSink interface {
 	LogSink
 

slogr/slogr.go

@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ limitations under the License.
 // APIs.
 //
 // See the README in the top-level [./logr] package for a discussion of
-// interoperability.
+// interoperability. The same functionality is also available through the main
+// logr package.
 package slogr
 
 import (
@@ -35,6 +36,9 @@ import (
 //
 // The logr verbosity level is mapped to slog levels such that V(0) becomes
 // slog.LevelInfo and V(4) becomes slog.LevelDebug.
+//
+// NewLogr is identical to [logr.NewFromSlogHandler]. Either of these can
+// be used.
 func NewLogr(handler slog.Handler) logr.Logger {
 	return logr.NewFromSlogHandler(handler)
 }
@@ -57,6 +61,9 @@ func NewLogr(handler slog.Handler) logr.Logger {
 //	slog.New(NewSlogHandler(logger)).Warning(...) -> logger.GetSink().Info(level=0, ...)
 //	slog.New(NewSlogHandler(logger)).Info(...) -> logger.GetSink().Info(level=0, ...)
 //	slog.New(NewSlogHandler(logger.V(4))).Info(...) -> logger.GetSink().Info(level=4, ...)
+//
+// NewSlogHandler is identical to [logr.NewSlogHandler]. Either of these can
+// be used.
 func NewSlogHandler(logger logr.Logger) slog.Handler {
 	return logr.NewSlogHandler(logger)
 }
@@ -84,4 +91,6 @@ func NewSlogHandler(logger logr.Logger) slog.Handler {
 // An implementation could support both interfaces in two different types, but then
 // additional interfaces would be needed to convert between those types in NewLogr
 // and NewSlogHandler.
+//
+// SlogSink is identical to [logr.SlogSink]. Either of these can be used.
 type SlogSink = logr.SlogSink