Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve error handling in writePacket #1601

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

methane
Copy link
Member

@methane methane commented Jun 16, 2024

  • handle error before success case.
  • return io.ErrShortWrite if not all bytes were written but err is nil.
  • return err instead of ErrInvalidConn.

Checklist

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
  • All tests passing
  • Extended the README / documentation, if necessary
  • Added myself / the copyright holder to the AUTHORS file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and cleanup in the packet writing process.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced connection testing by adding new fields and initializing them properly.
    • Updated error comparison logic in TestPingErrInvalidConn for more accurate test results.

* handle error before success case.
* return io.ErrShortWrite if not all bytes were written but err is nil.
* return err instead of ErrInvalidConn.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance error handling and configuration initialization in the packets.go and connection_test.go files. The writePacket function was refactored to improve error handling, while test modifications include new field initializations and error comparison adjustments for better test accuracy and robustness.

Changes

File Change Summary
packets.go Restructured the writePacket function to improve error handling and control flow. Added comments for clarity.
connection_test.go Added closech channel and cfg field initialization in mc struct. Changed error comparison in TestPingErrInvalidConn from ErrInvalidConn to nc.err.

Poem

Amidst the code where logic blooms,
A rabbit ponders amidst the glooms,
Improved the flow where packets roam,
And tests now call new configs home.
With channels and fields to guide the quest,
Our refactored code performs its best.
Hooray for changes, neat and bright,
Our code now gleams with improved light! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 52c1917 and e965e01.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packets.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packets.go (2)

127-137: Improved error handling in writePacket function.

The changes here handle the case where an error occurs during packet writing more robustly. Specifically, it checks if an error was returned and no bytes were written, then returns errBadConnNoWrite. This is a good practice as it ensures that the error state of the connection is accurately reported, preventing further operations on a potentially bad connection.


140-145: Ensure proper error handling when packet size written is incorrect.

The addition of a check for io.ErrShortWrite when the number of bytes written does not match the expected size is a crucial improvement. This adheres to the io.Writer interface contract, which states that a non-nil error should be returned if the full length of bytes is not written. This change ensures that such protocol violations are correctly handled, improving the robustness of the packet writing logic.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e965e01 and 028f718.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • connection_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
connection_test.go (2)

166-167: Initialization of closech and cfg in the mc struct enhances the robustness and configurability of the connection handling.


189-190: Changing the error comparison to nc.err in TestPingErrInvalidConn makes the test more specific and accurate.

Verification successful

The review comment is correct. The nc.err is properly defined and assigned within the connection_test.go file, making the test more specific and accurate.

  • nc := badConnection{err: errors.New("boom")}
  • nc := badConnection{err: errors.New("failed to write"), n: 10}

These assignments ensure that nc.err is set correctly for the error comparison in the test.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in `TestPingErrInvalidConn` function.

# Test: Search for error handling changes. Expect: Only the new error handling logic.
rg --type go 'nc.err' connection_test.go

Length of output: 110



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition and assignment of `nc.err` in connection_test.go.

# Search for the definition and assignment of `nc.err` in the file.
rg --type go 'nc\.err' connection_test.go

Length of output: 113



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the definition and assignment of `nc` in connection_test.go.

# Search for the definition and assignment of `nc` in the file.
rg --type go '\bnc\b' connection_test.go

Length of output: 340

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 82.446% (-0.07%) from 82.516%
when pulling 028f718 on methane:ErrShortWrite
into 52c1917 on go-sql-driver:master.

@methane methane requested a review from shogo82148 June 16, 2024 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

@shogo82148 shogo82148 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@methane methane merged commit 3484db1 into go-sql-driver:master Jun 28, 2024
61 checks passed
@methane methane deleted the ErrShortWrite branch June 28, 2024 23:36
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants