Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.17.0 #83

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 9, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/go-vela/types require minor v0.15.1 -> v0.17.0

Release Notes

go-vela/types

v0.17.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: go-vela/types@v0.15.1...v0.17.0

v0.16.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: go-vela/types@v0.15.0...v0.16.2

v0.16.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: go-vela/types@v0.15.0...v0.16.1

v0.16.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: go-vela/types@v0.15.0...v0.16.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 9, 2022 16:35
@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Indicates a change to dependencies label Nov 9, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #83 (be625d5) into main (c81898b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #83   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.71%   63.71%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         667      667           
=======================================
  Hits          425      425           
  Misses        236      236           
  Partials        6        6           

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-go-vela-types-0.x branch from 0781233 to 053d5c4 Compare November 9, 2022 20:02
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.16.0 fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.16.1 Nov 9, 2022
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.16.1 fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.16.2 Nov 15, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-go-vela-types-0.x branch from 053d5c4 to 8101a75 Compare November 15, 2022 21:41
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.16.2 fix(deps): update module github.com/go-vela/types to v0.17.0 Dec 16, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-go-vela-types-0.x branch from 8101a75 to 9319910 Compare December 16, 2022 23:52
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/git.luolix.top-go-vela-types-0.x branch from 9319910 to be625d5 Compare December 21, 2022 20:28
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrockopp jbrockopp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@wass3r wass3r merged commit 719fd8f into main Jan 19, 2023
@wass3r wass3r deleted the renovate/git.luolix.top-go-vela-types-0.x branch January 19, 2023 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Indicates a change to dependencies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants