Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts and comments on moving quickjs to a thirdparty directory? #139

Closed
fire opened this issue Sep 24, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Thoughts and comments on moving quickjs to a thirdparty directory? #139

fire opened this issue Sep 24, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@fire
Copy link
Collaborator

fire commented Sep 24, 2022

Thoughts and comments on moving quickjs to a thirdparty directory?

I did in my branch but wanted commentary.

@Geequlim
Copy link
Collaborator

Do you mean the thirdparty folder of godot?
I don't think it's a good idea. It's simpler to simple clone the repo to godot modules folder and build it for other developers.

@Geequlim
Copy link
Collaborator

This module should contains all the dependencies. In V8 or nodejs backend the static libraries will be included instead of build from code with scons.

@fire
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fire commented Sep 24, 2022

you misunderstood.

  1. javascript/quickjs/quickjs -> javascript/thirdparty/quickjs

@fire
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fire commented Sep 24, 2022

For example:

  1. javascript/thirdparty/quickjs
  2. javascript/thirdparty/v8
  3. javascript/thirdparty/wasm3

@Geequlim
Copy link
Collaborator

That's looks good to me

@fire fire mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2023
@fire
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fire commented Apr 29, 2023

My pr here #156 moves the quickjs folder to thirdparty.

@fire
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fire commented Oct 1, 2023

Closing after merge. 9a3cd3f

@fire fire closed this as completed Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants