v3: Improve and simplify logic of ctx.Next() #3063
Conversation
gaby
requested review from
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe recent updates improve the efficiency of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Router
participant DefaultCtx
User->>Router: Send GET request
Router->>DefaultCtx: Initialize context and call Next
DefaultCtx->>DefaultCtx: Process route and handler
DefaultCtx-->>Router: Return control to router
Router-->>User: Send response
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3063 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.13% 83.12% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 8323 8321 -2
==========================================
- Hits 6919 6917 -2
- Misses 1074 1075 +1
+ Partials 330 329 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- ctx.go (1 hunks)
- router_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
ctx.go
[warning] 1035-1036: ctx.go#L1035-L1036
Added lines #L1035 - L1036 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (4)
router_test.go (1)
546-564: LGTM!The benchmark function
Benchmark_Router_Next_Defaultis well-structured and follows the typical benchmarking pattern in Go.However, ensure that the benchmark function is correctly registered and used in the codebase.
Verification successful
The benchmark function is correctly registered and used.
The function
Benchmark_Router_Next_Defaultis correctly defined and referenced in a comment for running the benchmark.
router_test.go: The function is defined and referenced in a comment showing how to run the benchmark.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the benchmark function `Benchmark_Router_Next_Default` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new benchmark function. rg --type go $'Benchmark_Router_Next_Default'Length of output: 209
ctx.go (3)
1026-1026: LGTM! Incrementing handler index is correct.The increment of the handler index is logically sound.
1030-1031: LGTM! Continuing route stack is correct.The function correctly continues executing the next handler in the route stack.
1039-1040: LGTM! Continuing handler stack is correct.The function correctly continues executing the next handler in the handler stack.
| // Continue handler stack | ||
| if c.app.newCtxFunc != nil { | ||
| _, err := c.app.nextCustom(c) | ||
| return err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplified control flow is correct but lacks test coverage.
The simplification of the control flow is correct and improves readability. However, lines 1035-1036 are not covered by tests.
+ // Ensure lines 1035-1036 are covered by tests.Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1035-1036: ctx.go#L1035-L1036
Added lines #L1035 - L1036 were not covered by tests
Description
Benchmarks (25 runs)
Summary of ns/op differences:
Run 1 (Before):
Run 2 (After):
Conclusion:
Percent Differences:
Summary of Iteration Differences:
Run 1 (before):
Run 2 (after):
Percent Differences:
Comments
Changes introduced
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.