Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2: GHSA-xj7v-c82w-92q2 #1952

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Jul 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

In GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-xj7v-c82w-92q2, there is a vulnerability in the following Go packages or modules:

Unit Fixed Vulnerable Ranges
github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 1.5.0-rc1 < 1.5.0-rc1

Cross references:

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

modules:
    - module: github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2
      versions:
        - fixed: 1.5.0-rc1
      packages:
        - package: github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2
summary: Argo Exposure of Sensitive Information
description: |-
    In Argo versions prior to v1.5.0-rc1, it was possible for authenticated Argo
    users to submit API calls to retrieve secrets and other manifests which were
    stored within git.
cves:
    - CVE-2018-21034
ghsas:
    - GHSA-xj7v-c82w-92q2
references:
    - web: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-21034
    - report: https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/470
    - fix: https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/pull/3088
    - web: https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/blob/a1afe44066fcd0a0ab90a02a23177164bbad42cf/util/diff/diff.go#L399
    - web: https://www.soluble.ai/blog/argo-cves-2020
    - advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xj7v-c82w-92q2

@neild neild self-assigned this Jul 31, 2023
@neild neild added the excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. label Jul 31, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/514636 mentions this issue: data/excluded: batch add 31 excluded reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592762 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 75 reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/606788 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 20 reports (8)

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2024
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1912.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1915.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1919.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1922.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1924.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1925.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1927.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1928.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1931.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1932.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1936.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1938.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1939.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1940.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1942.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1945.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1946.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1948.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1950.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1952.yaml

Updates #1912
Updates #1915
Updates #1919
Updates #1922
Updates #1924
Updates #1925
Updates #1927
Updates #1928
Updates #1931
Updates #1932
Updates #1936
Updates #1938
Updates #1939
Updates #1940
Updates #1942
Updates #1945
Updates #1946
Updates #1948
Updates #1950
Updates #1952

Change-Id: Id25f09c8f7270af68238752db96d6a399b91ef36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vulndb/+/606788
Auto-Submit: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants