Fixed vtable duplication for binary annotator #7809
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dbaileychess
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fed8be6
to
bfac0b2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found out that vtables could be shared across unique Table types, not just within the same table type.
This required changing the code in the binary annotator to account for this fact, since I use the vtable's fields to annotate the binary.
Updated the text output to not include
+in the offset calculated location, as this produce the same symbol used to refer to the lines. This made finding the offset in a very large file really hard, since find-in-file searching couldn't tell the two part.