Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

crane auth get: convert back to credentials #898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2021

Conversation

jonjohnsonjr
Copy link
Collaborator

Before, this would just print the AuthConfig that we get back from the
config file read. This is often what we want, but it prevents crane from
acting as a credential helper itself.

By converting back to the credential helper structs, we can use crane as
a meta-credential-helper that can multiplex over anything in your config
file.

Before, this would just print the AuthConfig that we get back from the
config file read. This is often what we want, but it prevents crane from
acting as a credential helper itself.

By converting back to the credential helper structs, we can use crane as
a meta-credential-helper that can multiplex over anything in your config
file.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #898 (8143b6c) into master (3584fa0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #898   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.53%   72.53%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines        4672     4672           
=======================================
  Hits         3389     3389           
  Misses        773      773           
  Partials      510      510           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3584fa0...8143b6c. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants