Prevent endless loop in lock cycle detection. The following scenario would previously fail: #1681
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prevent endless loop in lock cycle detection. The following scenario would previously fail:
lockOrDetectPotentialLocksCycle
:lockThreadIsWaitingOn
, unlock CAF.classlockOwnerThread
, remove itself fromlockThreadIsWaitingOn
lockOrDetectPotentialLocksCycle
lockOrDetectPotentialLocksCycle
:lockThreadIsWaitingOn
, unlock CAF.classT2: Enter
lockOrDetectPotentialLocksCycle
detectPotentialLocksCycle
.At this point,
detectPotentialLocksCycle
will now loop forever, because thelockOwnerThread
is also inlockThreadIsWaitingOn
. During the course of looping forever, it will OOM, because it's building up an in-memory structure of what it thinks are cycles.The solution is to avoid the re-entrant T1 from adding itself to
lockThreadIsWaitingOn
if it's already thelockOwnerThread
. It's guaranteed that it won't relinquish the lock concurrently, because it's the exact same thread that owns it.Fixes #1635 and Fixes #1510