Fix issues with recursive JIT loading that would lead to a deadlock and/or crash inside Guava's LoadingCache. The problem had to do with the fact that Guice eagerly stores uninitialized JIT bindings in an attempt to allow circular dependencies, and Guice also attempts to cleanup failed JIT bindings (to remove these uninitialized JIT bindings). The JIT binding cache was a guard against a recursive call back into the constructor's cache, but we were removing that guard. #1684
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix issues with recursive JIT loading that would lead to a deadlock and/or crash inside Guava's LoadingCache. The problem had to do with the fact that Guice eagerly stores uninitialized JIT bindings in an attempt to allow circular dependencies, and Guice also attempts to cleanup failed JIT bindings (to remove these uninitialized JIT bindings). The JIT binding cache was a guard against a recursive call back into the constructor's cache, but we were removing that guard.
We now only remove the guard if we aren't in the process of loading that JIT binding. The failed JIT binding is naturally cleaned up later on, as the existing & new tests attest to.
Fixes many issues:
Many thanks to @swankjesse for the test-case added in #1389 that was helpful in diagnosing the problem, and to @PaulFridrick for the diagnoses in #1633.