Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cite stable docs for bit validity of numeric types #1869

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

mrothNET
Copy link
Contributor

The cited text is on the stable docs since a few months.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.41%. Comparing base (e35a74b) to head (d28f48c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1869   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.41%   87.41%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        5997     5997           
=======================================
  Hits         5242     5242           
  Misses        755      755           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

src/impls.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 11, 2024 13:55

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@mrothNET mrothNET force-pushed the update_numeric_safety_bit_validity branch from 6a0452a to 8852876 Compare October 11, 2024 13:55
@jswrenn jswrenn added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 11, 2024
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 11, 2024 14:05

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@mrothNET mrothNET force-pushed the update_numeric_safety_bit_validity branch from 8852876 to d28f48c Compare October 11, 2024 14:05
Merged via the queue into google:main with commit 246bd90 Oct 11, 2024
87 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants