Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: get rid of fs-extra #1418

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023
Merged

fix: get rid of fs-extra #1418

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023

Conversation

alexander-fenster
Copy link
Contributor

We cannot use the new shiny recursive fs/promises methods such as fs.rm and fs.cp, but at least let's stop using fs-extra because we already import mkdirp, ncp, and rimraf, and that should be enough.

As soon as we drop Node 14, we'll drop these three as well.

@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster requested review from a team as code owners February 3, 2023 00:30
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: s Pull request size is small. label Feb 3, 2023
@sofisl
Copy link
Contributor

sofisl commented Feb 3, 2023

Should we create an accompanying issue to drop the dependencies (maybe with DROP NODE 14 in the title so we remember)?

@alexander-fenster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure! #1419

@alexander-fenster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh no, rimraf v4 does not support Node 12 :) Rolling that part back.

@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster changed the title fix: get rid of fs-extra, upgrade rimraf fix: get rid of fs-extra Feb 3, 2023
@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster merged commit 082e006 into main Feb 3, 2023
@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster deleted the no-fs-extra branch February 3, 2023 02:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants