Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use Gson instead of Jackson #1661

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2021
Merged

fix: use Gson instead of Jackson #1661

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2021

Conversation

elharo
Copy link
Contributor

@elharo elharo commented Jan 6, 2021

@elharo elharo requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2021 20:42
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 6, 2021
@elharo elharo changed the title use Gson instead of Jackson fix: use Gson instead of Jackson Jan 11, 2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elharo elharo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ping ping ping

@chingor13 chingor13 merged commit 63ed2ca into master Jan 14, 2021
@chingor13 chingor13 deleted the jackson branch January 14, 2021 22:51
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* 
---
### [1.31.2](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/compare/v1.31.1...v1.31.2) (2021-01-14)


### Bug Fixes

* remove unused code ([#1664](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/issues/1664)) ([3e9169f](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/commit/3e9169f1af87dd947d24440f82fd4e0d7d4e4e5a))
* use Gson instead of Jackson ([#1661](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/issues/1661)) ([63ed2ca](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/commit/63ed2caecc200a407ef40b249bed158f18e2c5ae))


### Documentation

* Update the documentation link for GoogleCredential from deprecated version to newer version ([#1652](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/issues/1652)) ([98db6ca](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/commit/98db6ca0113396e715894a083227f062269ca93d))


### Dependencies

* update Guava to 30.0 ([#1645](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/issues/1645)) ([9e34f37](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/commit/9e34f37e2ef667507e03cb2d495b2c945851eb30))
* update Guava to 30.1 ([#1658](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/issues/1658)) ([677011e](https://www.github.com/googleapis/google-api-java-client/commit/677011ea4ec40e85d6e219de4e0d8d095b40acd8))
---


This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
@hiranya911
Copy link

@chingor13 @elharo

Can you share some context on why this change was made? This change is making it difficult for us (Firebase) to upgrade our SDK dependency from Google API client 1.30.x to 1.31.x. The use of Gson significantly changes how certain JSON input is handled, which is causing numerous test failures in our code.

@elharo
Copy link
Contributor Author

elharo commented Apr 28, 2021

go/json-madness

@hiranya911
Copy link

Thanks @elharo. I've submitted a detailed bug report with our findings at #1779

mauriciogg pushed a commit to mauriciogg/bazel that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
google-api-client migrated from jackson to gson
see googleapis/google-api-java-client#1661.
The first release that contained this change is 1.32.1.
Bazel removed the jackson artifacts but did not update the library
accordingly and fails at runtime when google-api-client tries to
access jackson classes

Updating to first version after 1.32.1 that does not have any
listed vulnerability
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants