Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

build: perform publish using Node 12 #1035

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2020
Merged

build: perform publish using Node 12 #1035

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2020

Conversation

SurferJeffAtGoogle
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was generated using Autosynth. 🌈

  • To automatically regenerate this PR, check this box.

Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@5747555

@SurferJeffAtGoogle
build: perform publish using Node 12
f57aa5d 
Source-Author: Benjamin E. Coe <bencoe@google.com>
Source-Date: Wed Aug 12 12:12:29 2020 -0700
Source-Repo: googleapis/synthtool
Source-Sha: 5747555f7620113d9a2078a48f4c047a99d31b3e
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@5747555
@SurferJeffAtGoogle SurferJeffAtGoogle requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2020 19:40
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Aug 12, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #1035 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1035   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.52%   91.52%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        4093     4093           
  Branches      454      488   +34     
=======================================
  Hits         3746     3746           
  Misses        347      347

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eb54ee9...411f0d0. Read the comment docs.

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Aug 13, 2020
@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link
Contributor

Your PR has attempted to merge for 3 hours. Please check that all required checks have passed, you have an automerge label, and that all your reviewers have approved the PR

@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link
Contributor

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, or one of your required reviews was not approved. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Aug 13, 2020
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labels Aug 13, 2020
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labels Aug 13, 2020
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 714247d into master Aug 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith approved these changes

Assignees

@bcoe bcoe

Labels
automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. context: full
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@SurferJeffAtGoogle @JustinBeckwith @bcoe @yoshi-kokoro