Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add field for enabled Beta K8s APIs in proto #3823

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 10, 2023

Conversation

gcf-owl-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2022

  • Regenerate this pull request now.

feat: add etags for cluster and node pool update operations

Clients may now optionally specify the previously read etag for a cluster or node pool during update requests. The etag is regenerated every time the object is updated. If an etag is provided, it will be checked against the current etag, and the request will be rejected on mismatch. This is particularly useful for allowing two clients to concurrently update a repeated field without overwriting each other.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 500787735

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@961d1ee

Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis-gen/commit/6d95a0e2be7fb65cfee8b49a29c0e21acf673195
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLWNvbnRhaW5lci8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNmQ5NWEwZTJiZTdmYjY1Y2ZlZThiNDlhMjljMGUyMWFjZjY3MzE5NSJ9

BEGIN_NESTED_COMMIT
feat: add etags for cluster and node pool update operations
Clients may now optionally specify the previously read etag for a cluster or node pool during update requests. The etag is regenerated every time the object is updated. If an etag is provided, it will be checked against the current etag, and the request will be rejected on mismatch. This is particularly useful for allowing two clients to concurrently update a repeated field without overwriting each other.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 498249600

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@9a294bf

Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis-gen/commit/f0f0e1ffc3e28e203e7c233af4936688c9b2b07f
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLWNvbnRhaW5lci8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiZjBmMGUxZmZjM2UyOGUyMDNlN2MyMzNhZjQ5MzY2ODhjOWIyYjA3ZiJ9
END_NESTED_COMMIT

Clients may now optionally specify the previously read etag for a cluster or node pool during update requests. The etag is regenerated every time the object is updated. If an etag is provided, it will be checked against the current etag, and the request will be rejected on mismatch. This is particularly useful for allowing two clients to concurrently update a repeated field without overwriting each other.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 498249600

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@9a294bf

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@f0f0e1f
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLWNvbnRhaW5lci8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiZjBmMGUxZmZjM2UyOGUyMDNlN2MyMzNhZjQ5MzY2ODhjOWIyYjA3ZiJ9
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 29, 2022 01:01
@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2022

No region tags are edited in this PR.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 29, 2022

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 29, 2022

/gcbrun

@sofisl sofisl added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Jan 5, 2023
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 5, 2023

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 5, 2023

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 5, 2023

/gcbrun

@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link
Contributor

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Jan 5, 2023
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 5, 2023

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 6, 2023

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 9, 2023

/gcbrun

---
feat: add etags for cluster and node pool update operations

Clients may now optionally specify the previously read etag for a cluster or node pool during update requests. The etag is regenerated every time the object is updated. If an etag is provided, it will be checked against the current etag, and the request will be rejected on mismatch. This is particularly useful for allowing two clients to concurrently update a repeated field without overwriting each other.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 500787735

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@961d1ee

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@6d95a0e
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLWNvbnRhaW5lci8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNmQ5NWEwZTJiZTdmYjY1Y2ZlZThiNDlhMjljMGUyMWFjZjY3MzE5NSJ9
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot changed the title feat: add etags for cluster and node pool update operations feat: Add field for enabled Beta K8s APIs in proto Jan 10, 2023
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 10, 2023

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 10, 2023

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Jan 10, 2023

/gcbrun

@sofisl sofisl merged commit 1a3497a into main Jan 10, 2023
@sofisl sofisl deleted the owl-bot-copy-packages-google-container branch January 10, 2023 21:38
@release-please release-please bot mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2023
@release-please release-please bot mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants