Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-storage to v1.113.13 #491

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.google.cloud:google-cloud-storage 1.113.12 -> 1.113.13 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

googleapis/java-storage

v1.113.13

Compare Source


Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 8, 2021 23:56
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 8, 2021
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage-nio API. label Mar 8, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Mar 8, 2021
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 8, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #491 (cd6bbcb) into master (376ff9a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #491   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     72.57%   72.57%           
  Complexity      500      500           
=========================================
  Files            29       29           
  Lines          1670     1670           
  Branches        276      276           
=========================================
  Hits           1212     1212           
  Misses          335      335           
  Partials        123      123           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 376ff9a...cd6bbcb. Read the comment docs.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/com.google.cloud-google-cloud-storage-1.x branch from fe298d7 to cd6bbcb Compare March 10, 2021 23:46
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 10, 2021
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 10, 2021
@Neenu1995 Neenu1995 added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Mar 11, 2021
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 14bacab into googleapis:master Mar 11, 2021
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Mar 11, 2021
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/com.google.cloud-google-cloud-storage-1.x branch March 11, 2021 00:24
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage-nio API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants