chore: sync v3 with master branch #880
Conversation
* chore: protect v3.x.x branch In preparation for breaking changes. * force pattern to be a string * simplify branch name
…googleapis#815) That warning should only be used when BQ Storage client is explicitly passed in to RowIterator methods when max_results value is also set.
…ields for BQML. (googleapis#817) PiperOrigin-RevId: 387137741 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@8962c92 Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis-gen/commit/102f1b4277cc5a049663535d9eeb77831b67de25
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
These two lines bring the rules on this repo in line with the defaults: https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/63c858e539e1f4d9bb8ea66e12f9c0a0de5fef55/packages/sync-repo-settings/src/required-checks.json#L40-L50
The backend API has a timeout of 4 minutes, so the default of 2 minutes was not allowing for any retries to happen in some cases. Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) Fixes googleapis#853 🦕
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tim Swast <swast@google.com>
…leapis#866) [](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [google-cloud-bigquery](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery) | `==2.23.2` -> `==2.23.3` | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | *** ### Release Notes <details> <summary>googleapis/python-bigquery</summary> ### [`v2.23.3`](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2233-httpswwwgithubcomgoogleapispython-bigquerycomparev2232v2233-2021-08-06) [Compare Source](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/compare/v2.23.2...v2.23.3) </details> *** ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. *** * \[ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box. *** This PR has been generated by [WhiteSource Renovate](https://renovate.whitesourcesoftware.com). View repository job log [here](https://app.renovatebot.com/dashboard#github/googleapis/python-bigquery).
* feat: add support for transaction statistics * Hoist transaction_info into base job class * Add versionadded directive to new property and class * Include new class in docs reference
googleapis#863) [](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [google-cloud-bigquery-storage](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery-storage) | `==2.6.2` -> `==2.6.3` | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | *** ### Release Notes <details> <summary>googleapis/python-bigquery-storage</summary> ### [`v2.6.3`](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery-storage/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#263-httpswwwgithubcomgoogleapispython-bigquery-storagecomparev262v263-2021-08-06) [Compare Source](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery-storage/compare/v2.6.2...v2.6.3) </details> *** ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. *** * \[x] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box. *** This PR has been generated by [WhiteSource Renovate](https://renovate.whitesourcesoftware.com). View repository job log [here](https://app.renovatebot.com/dashboard#github/googleapis/python-bigquery).
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@6252f2c Post-Processor: gcr.io/repo-automation-bots/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:50e35228649c47b6ca82aa0be3ff9eb2afce51c82b66c4a03fe4afeb5ff6c0fc Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…s#867) * feat: make the same Table instances equal to each other * Table equality should ignore metadata differences * Compare instances through tableReference property * Make Table instances hashable * Make Table* classes interchangeable If these classes reference the same table, they are now considered equal.
…larQueryParameter` constructor (googleapis#850) Follow-up to https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/pull/840/files#r679880582 Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [x] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) Fixes googleapis#539 🦕 Previously, we only retried failed API requests. Now, we retry failed jobs (according to the predicate of the `Retry` object passed to `job.result()`).
…ogleapis#865) Co-authored-by: Tim Swast <swast@google.com> Co-authored-by: Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com>
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@facee4c Post-Processor: gcr.io/repo-automation-bots/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:9743664022bd63a8084be67f144898314c7ca12f0a03e422ac17c733c129d803 Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
](https://renovatebot.com){kind=link}
* fix: remove pytz dependency * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md * fix(deps): require pyarrow>=3.0.0 * remove version check for pyarrow * require pyarrow 3.0 in pandas extra * remove _BIGNUMERIC_SUPPORT references from tests Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dina Graves Portman <dinagraves@google.com> Co-authored-by: Tim Swast <swast@google.com>
product-auto-label
bot
added
the
api: bigquery
google-cla
bot
added
the
cla: yes
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
google-cla
bot
added
cla: no
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
@googlebot I consent. @tswast because this PR includes commits from third-party contributors, you likely need to flip the CLA flag manually. |
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
tswast
added
cla: yes
Other than the merge commits and e94597d, all other changes have already been reviewed.
TODO:
Int64andbooleandtypes into_dataframe#786to_dataframe. e94597d