Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 16, 2019. It is now read-only.

Update reference.html - getTotalMarkers() #107

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gh-pages
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thisisthefuture
Copy link

Description of getTotalMarkers() is incorrect.
The comment for getTotalMarkers() and in use shows the method returns the number of markers in the clusterer, not an array.

Description of getTotalMarkers() is incorrect.
The comment for getTotalMarkers() and in use shows the method returns the number of markers in the clusterer, not an array.
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@thisisthefuture
Copy link
Author

I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

Remo added a commit to gmaps-marker-clusterer/gmaps-marker-clusterer that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2016
@Remo
Copy link
Contributor

Remo commented Dec 23, 2016

@thisisthefuture unfortunately google doesn't support this repo anymore, but we've merged your changes to our own fork https://github.com/gmaps-marker-clusterer/gmaps-marker-clusterer
documentation can be found here https://gmaps-marker-clusterer.github.io/gmaps-marker-clusterer/#methods

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants