feat: optimize sqlserver test #652
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to various files related to Docker and database configurations. Key modifications include changing hardcoded database credentials to use variables, updating the SQL Server Docker image repository, enhancing connection logic, and adding a new function to check for the GitHub Action environment. These changes improve flexibility and maintainability in the codebase. Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional comments not posted (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #652 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.14% 70.08% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 184 184
Lines 11340 11357 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 7955 7959 +4
- Misses 2803 2811 +8
- Partials 582 587 +5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
support/docker/sqlserver.go (2)
124-161: Security concern: Using the 'sa' account for initial setup.Connecting to the SQL Server using the 'sa' account can pose security risks. It's generally recommended to use a less privileged account for database operations when possible.
Consider creating a dedicated administration user with the minimal required privileges to perform setup tasks, reducing the reliance on the 'sa' account.
122-162: Potential race conditions during setup in concurrent environments.If multiple instances of this setup run concurrently, there may be race conditions when checking for the existence of the database and user. This could lead to errors or inconsistent states.
Implement locking mechanisms or use idempotent queries to handle concurrent executions safely. SQL Server supports application locks that can be used to serialize access.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- support/docker/docker.go (1 hunks)
- support/docker/postgres_test.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlite_test.go (1 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlserver.go (2 hunks)
- support/docker/sqlserver_test.go (1 hunks)
- support/env/env.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
support/env/env.go (2)
3-6: LGTM!Grouping related packages together improves code readability. The import statements look good.
44-50: LGTM!The
IsGithub()function is implemented correctly and the documentation is clear. This function can be useful for environment-specific configurations or behaviors.support/docker/sqlite_test.go (1)
39-39: Ensure thedatabasevariable is defined and assigned correctly.The change to use a
databasevariable instead of a hardcoded string makes the test more flexible and configurable, which is a positive improvement.However, the
databasevariable is not defined or assigned a value within the provided code context. This could lead to a compilation error or unexpected behavior during test execution.Please ensure that the
databasevariable is properly defined and assigned the expected value before using it in the assertion.Also, verify if the
databasevariable is defined and assigned correctly in other parts of the codebase that may be setting up or configuring the test environment.support/docker/sqlserver_test.go (3)
40-40: LGTM!The assertion correctly verifies that the database name in the SQL Server configuration matches the
databasevariable. This change enhances flexibility by allowing the use of dynamic values instead of hardcoded strings.
41-41: LGTM!The assertion correctly verifies that the username in the SQL Server configuration matches the
usernamevariable. This change enhances flexibility by allowing the use of dynamic values instead of hardcoded strings.
42-42: LGTM!The assertion correctly verifies that the password in the SQL Server configuration matches the
passwordvariable. This change enhances flexibility by allowing the use of dynamic values instead of hardcoded strings.support/docker/postgres_test.go (4)
40-40: LGTM!The assertion for the database name has been correctly updated to use the
databasevariable, aligning with the change made in theNewPostgresImplfunction call.
41-41: LGTM!The assertion for the username has been correctly updated to use the
usernamevariable, aligning with the change made in theNewPostgresImplfunction call.
42-42: LGTM!The assertion for the password has been correctly updated to use the
passwordvariable, aligning with the change made in theNewPostgresImplfunction call.
30-30: Verify the variable definitions and assignments.The
database,username, andpasswordvariables used in theNewPostgresImplfunction call are not defined within the provided code context. Ensure that these variables are properly defined and assigned appropriate values to avoid runtime errors or unexpected behavior.Run the following script to verify the variable definitions:
Verification successful
To further investigate the usage of the
database,username, andpasswordvariables in thepostgres_test.gofile, we need to examine its contents. Let's run another script to view the file:
The variable usage is correct, but their definitions are in a different file.
The
database,username, andpasswordvariables are correctly used in theNewPostgresImplfunction call within theSetupTestmethod of thePostgresTestSuite. These variables are also used in assertions to verify the postgres configuration.However, these variables are not defined within
postgres_test.go. They are likely defined as package-level variables in another file within thedockerpackage, possibly indocker.go. This is a common practice for sharing test configurations across multiple test files in the same package.To improve code clarity, consider one of the following:
- Add a comment near the variable usage explaining where they are defined.
- If possible, import these variables explicitly to make the dependency clear.
- Consider using a configuration struct passed to the test suite to make the test setup more explicit.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the variable definitions for `database`, `username`, and `password`. # Test: Search for the variable definitions. Expect: Variable definitions with appropriate values. rg --type go -A 5 $'(database|username|password)\s*='Length of output: 3392
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the contents of postgres_test.go # Display the contents of the file cat support/docker/postgres_test.go # Search for import statements and variable usages echo "--- Imports and variable usages ---" rg --type go -n "(import|\b(database|username|password)\b)" support/docker/postgres_test.goLength of output: 2553
support/docker/sqlserver.go (1)
31-35: Verify the correctness of the Docker image and environment variables.The Docker image has been updated to
"mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server", and the environment variableMSSQL_SA_PASSWORDis used to set the SA password. Ensure that this environment variable is correct for the new image and that the image tag"latest"is appropriate for your needs.Run the following script to confirm that
MSSQL_SA_PASSWORDis the correct variable and that the SQL Server starts as expected:Verification successful
Docker configuration for SQL Server is correct, with a minor suggestion.
The Docker configuration for SQL Server in
support/docker/sqlserver.gois correct and follows best practices:
- Uses the official Microsoft Container Registry image: "mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server"
- Sets required environment variables: ACCEPT_EULA and MSSQL_SA_PASSWORD
- Exposes the default SQL Server port: 1433
Minor suggestion:
- Consider pinning the image to a specific version instead of using "latest" for better reproducibility in production environments.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Test the SQL Server Docker image with the specified environment variable. # Test: Run the Docker image and check if it's accepting connections. docker run -e 'ACCEPT_EULA=Y' -e 'MSSQL_SA_PASSWORD=YourStrong!Passw0rd' -p 1433:1433 -d mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:latest # Give the server time to start sleep 15 # Check the SQL Server logs for any errors. docker logs $(docker ps -q --filter ancestor=mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:latest)Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Docker configuration related to SQL Server rg --type go "mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server" -A 10 # Check for environment variables related to SQL Server rg --type go "ACCEPT_EULA" -A 5 rg --type go "MSSQL_SA_PASSWORD" -A 5 # Look for port configuration rg --type go "1433" -C 5Length of output: 2314
| @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import ( | |||
| type ContainerType string | |||
|
|
|||
| const ( | |||
| password = "Goravel123" | |||
| password = "Framework!123" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Update approved, but action required for test files
The password change in support/docker/docker.go has been successfully implemented. However, there are a few important points to address:
-
The old password "Goravel123" is still present in
testing/docker/database_test.go. Please update these test cases to use either the new password or a different test password to avoid confusion and potential test failures. -
The
passwordconstant is used in various parts of the application, particularly in database-related code. Ensure that all components using this constant are still functioning correctly after the change. -
If there's any documentation referencing the old password, make sure to update it accordingly.
Action items:
- Update the password in
testing/docker/database_test.go - Verify the functionality of all components using the
passwordconstant - Update any relevant documentation
Analysis chain
Verify the password change across the codebase.
The password change looks good. However, please ensure that this new password is updated in all relevant places, such as:
- Configuration files
- Documentation
- Any other code references
Also, communicate this change to the team to avoid any disruptions.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the password constant:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `password` constant across the codebase.
# Test: Search for the `password` constant usage. Expect: Only occurrences with the new value.
rg --type go -A 5 $'password = "Framework!123"'
Length of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further verify the password change across the codebase.
# Test 1: Search for any remaining instances of the old password.
echo "Searching for old password:"
rg --type go -A 5 "Goravel123"
# Test 2: Look for uses of the 'password' constant.
echo "Searching for uses of 'password' constant:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'password'
Length of output: 5396
| for i := 0; i < 100; i++ { | ||
| instance, err = gormio.Open(sqlserver.New(sqlserver.Config{ | ||
| DSN: fmt.Sprintf("sqlserver://%s:%s@%s:%d?database=%s", | ||
| receiver.username, receiver.password, receiver.host, receiver.port, receiver.database), | ||
| DSN: fmt.Sprintf("sqlserver://%s:%s@%s:%d?database=master", | ||
| "sa", receiver.password, receiver.host, receiver.port), | ||
| })) | ||
|
|
||
| if err == nil { | ||
| // Check if database exists | ||
| var exists bool | ||
| query := fmt.Sprintf("SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.databases WHERE name = '%s') THEN CAST(1 AS BIT) ELSE CAST(0 AS BIT) END", receiver.database) | ||
| if err := instance.Raw(query).Scan(&exists).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if !exists { | ||
| // Create User database | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("CREATE DATABASE %s", receiver.database)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Create User account | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("CREATE LOGIN %s WITH PASSWORD = '%s'", receiver.username, receiver.password)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Create DB account for User | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("USE %s; CREATE USER %s FOR LOGIN %s", receiver.database, receiver.username, receiver.username)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Add permission | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("USE %s; ALTER ROLE db_owner ADD MEMBER %s", receiver.database, receiver.username)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| instance, err = gormio.Open(sqlserver.New(sqlserver.Config{ | ||
| DSN: fmt.Sprintf("sqlserver://%s:%s@%s:%d?database=%s", | ||
| receiver.username, receiver.password, receiver.host, receiver.port, receiver.database), | ||
| })) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling in the connection logic.
The connection logic has been extended to include database and user creation. However, if any of these steps fail, the error handling could be improved to provide more detailed information and ensure resources are cleaned up appropriately.
Consider adding more descriptive error messages and handling partial failures. For example:
// After each operation, check for errors and provide context
if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("CREATE DATABASE %s", receiver.database)).Error; err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create database '%s': %v", receiver.database, err)
}
// Similarly for other operations| if err := instance.Raw(query).Scan(&exists).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if !exists { | ||
| // Create User database | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("CREATE DATABASE %s", receiver.database)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Create User account | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("CREATE LOGIN %s WITH PASSWORD = '%s'", receiver.username, receiver.password)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Create DB account for User | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("USE %s; CREATE USER %s FOR LOGIN %s", receiver.database, receiver.username, receiver.username)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Add permission | ||
| if err := instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("USE %s; ALTER ROLE db_owner ADD MEMBER %s", receiver.database, receiver.username)).Error; err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize database and user creation queries.
Currently, the code executes multiple SQL statements separately to set up the database and user. This can be optimized by combining statements and using transactions to ensure atomicity.
You can refactor the SQL commands into a single script:
script := fmt.Sprintf(`
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.databases WHERE name = N'%s')
BEGIN
CREATE DATABASE [%s];
END;
USE [%s];
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.sql_logins WHERE name = N'%s')
BEGIN
CREATE LOGIN [%s] WITH PASSWORD = N'%s';
END;
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.database_principals WHERE name = N'%s')
BEGIN
CREATE USER [%s] FOR LOGIN [%s];
ALTER ROLE db_owner ADD MEMBER [%s];
END;
`, receiver.database, receiver.database, receiver.database, receiver.username, receiver.username, receiver.password, receiver.username, receiver.username, receiver.username, receiver.username)
if err := instance.Exec(script).Error; err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to set up database and user: %v", err)
}This approach reduces the number of round trips to the database and ensures that the setup is only performed if necessary.
📑 Description
Can't connect the sqlserver docker in Github action, but local is normal. Switch the sqlserver image to another one.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests