feat: [#280] Implement Mysql driver #725
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple enhancements across various components related to database schema management. Key changes include the addition of new methods to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #725 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.72% 69.78% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 202 205 +3
Lines 16107 16334 +227
==========================================
+ Hits 11230 11398 +168
- Misses 4242 4295 +53
- Partials 635 641 +6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
database/schema/common_schema.go (1)
31-31: Consider refactoring and improving documentationThe implementation is correct but could benefit from some improvements:
- Consider extracting the common query execution pattern from both
GetTablesandGetViews.- Add documentation explaining the database name requirement and its implications.
Here's a suggested refactor to reduce duplication:
+func (r *CommonSchema) executeQuery(query string, result interface{}) error { + return r.orm.Query().Raw(query).Scan(result) +} func (r *CommonSchema) GetTables() ([]schema.Table, error) { var tables []schema.Table - if err := r.orm.Query().Raw(r.grammar.CompileTables(r.orm.DatabaseName())).Scan(&tables); err != nil { + if err := r.executeQuery(r.grammar.CompileTables(r.orm.DatabaseName()), &tables); err != nil { return nil, err } return tables, nil } func (r *CommonSchema) GetViews() ([]schema.View, error) { var views []schema.View - if err := r.orm.Query().Raw(r.grammar.CompileViews(r.orm.DatabaseName())).Scan(&views); err != nil { + if err := r.executeQuery(r.grammar.CompileViews(r.orm.DatabaseName()), &views); err != nil { return nil, err } return views, nil }database/schema/processors/mysql_test.go (1)
11-33: Enhance test coverage with additional scenariosWhile the current test cases cover basic functionality, consider adding the following scenarios for more robust testing:
- Indexes with special characters in names
- Single-column indexes
- Error cases (e.g., malformed column strings)
- Edge cases (e.g., very long index names, maximum columns)
- Primary and unique indexes
Here's a suggested enhancement:
func TestMysqlProcessIndexes(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string input []DBIndex expected []schema.Index }{ { name: "valid indexes", input: []DBIndex{ {Name: "INDEX_A", Type: "BTREE", Columns: "a,b"}, {Name: "INDEX_B", Type: "HASH", Columns: "c,d"}, }, expected: []schema.Index{ {Name: "index_a", Type: "btree", Columns: []string{"a", "b"}}, {Name: "index_b", Type: "hash", Columns: []string{"c", "d"}}, }, }, { name: "empty input", input: []DBIndex{}, expected: nil, }, + { + name: "special characters in name", + input: []DBIndex{ + {Name: "INDEX_$SPECIAL", Type: "BTREE", Columns: "a"}, + }, + expected: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "index_$special", Type: "btree", Columns: []string{"a"}}, + }, + }, + { + name: "primary and unique indexes", + input: []DBIndex{ + {Name: "PRIMARY", Type: "BTREE", Columns: "id"}, + {Name: "UNIQUE_EMAIL", Type: "BTREE", Columns: "email", Unique: true}, + }, + expected: []schema.Index{ + {Name: "primary", Type: "btree", Columns: []string{"id"}, Primary: true}, + {Name: "unique_email", Type: "btree", Columns: []string{"email"}, Unique: true}, + }, + }, } mysql := NewMysql() for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { result := mysql.ProcessIndexes(tt.input) assert.Equal(t, tt.expected, result) }) } }database/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go (1)
74-78: Consider improving the MySQL test structure.While the test correctly verifies MySQL-specific backtick wrapping, there are a few improvements to consider:
- Instead of directly modifying the
driverfield, consider creating a newWrapinstance with the MySQL driver- Add cleanup to reset the state after the test
Consider refactoring the test like this:
func (s *WrapTestSuite) TestValueOfMysql() { - s.wrap.driver = database.DriverMysql - result := s.wrap.Value("value") - s.Equal("`value`", result) + mysqlWrap := NewWrap(database.DriverMysql, "prefix_") + result := mysqlWrap.Value("value") + s.Equal("`value`", result) }contracts/database/schema/blueprint.go (2)
10-11: Consider enhancing the documentation with specific constraints.The documentation could be more helpful by specifying the exact size range or constraints of the big integer type (e.g., minimum/maximum values, signed/unsigned).
-// BigInteger Create a new big integer (8-byte) column on the table. +// BigInteger Create a new big integer (8-byte) column on the table. +// The column type is BIGINT, which allows values from -2^63 to 2^63-1.
34-35: Add documentation for the Primary method.The method is missing a documentation comment. Consider adding one that explains the purpose and behavior, especially for composite primary keys.
+// Primary Specify the primary key(s) for the table. +// Multiple columns can be specified to create a composite primary key. Primary(column ...string)database/schema/grammars/wrap.go (1)
38-41: LGTM: Clean implementation of column joiningThe new Columnize method provides a clean separation of concerns, handling the joining of processed columns separately from their processing.
Consider adding a comment explaining that this method provides the functionality previously handled by the Columns method, to help with future maintenance.
contracts/database/schema/schema.go (2)
84-84: Add documentation for the ShouldBeSkipped fieldWhile the field name is self-explanatory, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining:
- When a command should be marked as skipped
- The impact of skipping a command
- Examples of use cases where skipping is appropriate
Add a comment above the field:
+ // ShouldBeSkipped determines if this command should be excluded during SQL generation. + // This is useful in scenarios such as <add examples>. ShouldBeSkipped bool
73-85: Consider enhancing the Command pattern implementationThe current implementation adds a boolean flag to skip commands, but consider these architectural improvements:
- Instead of a boolean flag, consider implementing a
ShouldExecute() boolmethod on commands to encapsulate the skip logic- This would allow for more complex filtering rules in the future without modifying the struct
Example interface enhancement:
type DatabaseCommand interface { // ShouldExecute determines if this command should be executed // Returns false if the command should be skipped ShouldExecute() bool } // Command struct would implement this interface func (c *Command) ShouldExecute() bool { return !c.ShouldBeSkipped }database/schema/schema.go (1)
Line range hint
1-186: Excellent architecture for driver extensibility.The schema management system demonstrates a well-designed architecture that:
- Cleanly separates grammar and driver-specific implementations
- Maintains consistent error handling across drivers
- Uses dependency injection for configuration and logging
- Follows interface-based design for extensibility
This makes it straightforward to add support for new database drivers while maintaining consistency.
database/schema/blueprint.go (1)
152-154: LGTM! Consider adding debug logging.The implementation of command skipping is clean and well-placed. However, consider adding debug-level logging for skipped commands to aid in troubleshooting schema operations.
for _, command := range r.commands { if command.ShouldBeSkipped { + // TODO: Add debug logging once the framework's logger is available + // log.Debug("Skipping schema command", "command", command.Name) continue }database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go (2)
110-111: Document unused database parameterBoth
CompileTablesandCompileViewsnow accept adatabaseparameter to align with the interface, but SQLite doesn't utilize this parameter since it operates on a single database file. Consider adding a comment to explain this SQLite-specific behavior.+// CompileTables returns all tables in the SQLite database. +// The database parameter is unused as SQLite operates on a single database file. func (r *Sqlite) CompileTables(database string) string {Also applies to: 118-119
Line range hint
8-207: Architecture maintains good separation of concernsThe changes to the SQLite grammar implementation maintain a clean separation of concerns while standardizing the interface across different database drivers. The modifications support the framework's extensibility by:
- Using driver-specific initialization
- Standardizing column name handling
- Maintaining consistent method signatures across drivers
This approach will make it easier to add support for additional database drivers in the future.
database/schema/grammars/postgres.go (1)
116-119: Consider utilizing the database parameterThe
databaseparameter has been added toCompileTablesandCompileViewsmethods but isn't used in the SQL queries. Consider:
- Using the parameter to filter results by database
- Adding schema qualification where appropriate
Example improvement for CompileTables:
func (r *Postgres) CompileTables(database string) string { return "select c.relname as name, n.nspname as schema, pg_total_relation_size(c.oid) as size, " + "obj_description(c.oid, 'pg_class') as comment from pg_class c, pg_namespace n " + "where c.relkind in ('r', 'p') and n.oid = c.relnamespace and n.nspname not in ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema') " + + "and current_database() = " + r.wrap.Quote(database) + " " + "order by c.relname" }Also applies to: 136-138
database/schema/schema_test.go (1)
140-147: Consider using constants for index namesWhile the MySQL-specific primary key index check is correct, consider defining constants for the index names to improve maintainability and prevent typos.
+const ( + PostgresPrimaryKeyIndex = "goravel_primaries_pkey" + MysqlPrimaryKeyIndex = "primary" +) // SQLite does not support set primary index separately if driver == database.DriverPostgres { - s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, "goravel_primaries_pkey")) + s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, PostgresPrimaryKeyIndex)) } if driver == database.DriverMysql { - s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, "primary")) + s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, MysqlPrimaryKeyIndex)) }database/schema/grammars/mysql_test.go (4)
12-23: Consider enhancing test isolationWhile the setup is functional, consider resetting the grammar field after each test to ensure complete isolation between test cases.
func (s *MysqlSuite) SetupTest() { s.grammar = NewMysql("goravel_") } + +func (s *MysqlSuite) TearDownTest() { + s.grammar = nil +}
89-90: Consider using constants for SQL assertionsSQL assertions using string literals can be fragile and hard to maintain. Consider extracting expected SQL strings into constants or using a SQL builder for assertions.
const ( expectedCreateTableSQL = "create table `goravel_users` (`id` int auto_increment primary key not null, `name` varchar(100) null, primary key using btree(`role_id`, `user_id`))" expectedColumnsSQL = []string{"`id` int auto_increment primary key not null", "`name` varchar(10) default 'goravel' null"} )Also applies to: 229-230
25-41: Convert single-case tests to table-driven testsSeveral test methods use a single test case. Consider converting them to table-driven tests for consistency and easier addition of test cases in the future.
Example for TestCompileAdd:
func (s *MysqlSuite) TestCompileAdd() { tests := []struct { name string columnName string columnType string default interface{} nullable bool length int want string }{ { name: "add string column", columnName: "name", columnType: "string", default: "goravel", nullable: false, length: 1, want: "alter table `goravel_users` add `name` varchar(1) default 'goravel' not null", }, // Add more test cases } // ... test implementation }Also applies to: 102-107, 198-205, 272-282
207-230: Add edge cases to TestGetColumnsThe current test covers basic cases but could benefit from additional edge cases:
- Columns with special characters in names
- Columns with extreme length values
- Columns with different numeric types
database/schema/mysql_schema.go (2)
58-60: Clarify the unimplemented methodDropAllTypesThe method
DropAllTypescurrently returnsnilwithout any implementation. If MySQL doesn't support user-defined types, consider adding a comment to explain that this method is intentionally left blank.Apply this diff:
func (r *MysqlSchema) DropAllTypes() error { + // MySQL doesn't support dropping types as it doesn't have user-defined types. return nil }
92-94: Clarify the unimplemented methodGetTypesThe method
GetTypescurrently returnsnil, nilwithout any implementation. If MySQL doesn't have user-defined types, consider adding a comment to explain that this method is intentionally left blank.Apply this diff:
func (r *MysqlSchema) GetTypes() ([]contractsschema.Type, error) { + // MySQL doesn't support types enumeration as it doesn't have user-defined types. return nil, nil }database/schema/grammars/mysql.go (1)
164-170: SimplifyModifyNullablefunction by removing unnecessaryelseSince the
ifblock returns, theelseis redundant. Removing theelseimproves readability.Apply this diff to simplify the function:
func (r *Mysql) ModifyNullable(blueprint schema.Blueprint, column schema.ColumnDefinition) string { if column.GetNullable() { return " null" } - else { return " not null" - } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
mocks/database/orm/Orm.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/schema/Blueprint.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/schema/Grammar.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
contracts/database/orm/orm.go(1 hunks)contracts/database/schema/blueprint.go(2 hunks)contracts/database/schema/grammar.go(1 hunks)contracts/database/schema/schema.go(1 hunks)database/orm/orm.go(2 hunks)database/schema/blueprint.go(1 hunks)database/schema/common_schema.go(2 hunks)database/schema/grammars/mysql.go(1 hunks)database/schema/grammars/mysql_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/grammars/postgres.go(6 hunks)database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go(6 hunks)database/schema/grammars/wrap.go(3 hunks)database/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go(2 hunks)database/schema/mysql_schema.go(1 hunks)database/schema/processors/mysql.go(1 hunks)database/schema/processors/mysql_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/schema.go(1 hunks)database/schema/schema_test.go(3 hunks)support/docker/mysql.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (31)
database/schema/processors/mysql.go (2)
1-8: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.
16-29: Verify DBIndex type definition and usage.
Need to verify the structure and validation rules of the DBIndex type to ensure proper handling of index properties.
✅ Verification successful
DBIndex type and usage are properly defined and validated
The DBIndex type is well-defined in database/schema/processors/model.go with all necessary fields:
Columns: string (comma-separated column names)Name: string (index name)Primary: bool (primary key flag)Type: string (index type)Unique: bool (unique constraint flag)
The implementation in mysql.go correctly processes these fields:
- Splits comma-separated columns into a slice
- Converts names and types to lowercase for consistency
- Preserves primary and unique flags
Test files demonstrate proper validation across different scenarios including empty inputs and multiple index types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DBIndex type definition and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'type DBIndex struct {
$$$
}'
# Look for any validation rules or constraints
rg -A 5 'DBIndex'
Length of output: 6366
database/schema/common_schema.go (2)
Line range hint 1-35: Verify integration with MySQL grammar implementation
The changes look good and maintain clean separation of concerns. However, we should ensure:
- The MySQL grammar implementation properly handles the database name parameter.
- Other database drivers maintain compatibility with these changes.
Let's verify the integration:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check MySQL grammar implementation and other drivers
# Expected: Find CompileTables and CompileViews implementations
# Check for grammar implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_Grammar) CompileTables(database string) string {
$$$
}'
# Check for other database drivers
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_Grammar struct {
$$$
}'22-22: Verify database name handling for edge cases
The change to include database name in table queries is correct, but we should ensure proper handling of edge cases.
Let's verify the database name handling:
✅ Verification successful
Database name handling is properly implemented across drivers
The verification shows that database name handling is well-implemented:
- Each database driver (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite) has its own
CompileTablesimplementation that correctly handles the database parameter - MySQL specifically uses proper quoting for the database name via
r.wrap.Quote(database) - The database configuration is properly structured in the codebase with consistent database name handling
- The ORM contract and implementations maintain the
DatabaseName()interface consistently
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how database name is handled across the codebase
# Expected: Find implementations of DatabaseName() and its usage
# Check for DatabaseName implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$$) DatabaseName() string {
$$$
}'
# Check for error handling around database name
rg -A 3 'DatabaseName\(\)'
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify database name handling
# Check for database name related code
rg -l "DatabaseName"
# Check for database connection and configuration
rg -l "database.*name" -g "*.go"
# Look for SQL query compilation related to tables
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) CompileTables($$$) string {
$$$
}'
# Check for database configuration structures
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
Database string
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3961
database/schema/processors/mysql_test.go (2)
1-9: LGTM!
The package declaration and imports are well-organized and follow Go conventions.
1-33: Verify test suite integration
Let's ensure this test is properly integrated into the test suite and runs during CI.
✅ Verification successful
Test suite integration is properly configured
The test file is well-integrated into the test suite:
- It's covered by the main Codecov workflow which runs all Go tests
- The test follows the standard Go test pattern and is located in the correct database/schema/processors directory
- Several other test files exist in the database module, confirming the established testing structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the test file is included in any test suites or CI configurations
# Look for test suite configurations
rg -l "go test|testing" .github/workflows/
# Check if there are any test helper files that need to be updated
fd -e go -x rg -l "TestMain|testing.M" {}
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of CI files to understand test execution
cat .github/workflows/mail.yml .github/workflows/codecov.yml
# Look for test patterns in the repository
rg -g '*.go' "go test" -A 2
# Check if there are any test setup files in the database directory
fd -e go -p ".*test.*" database/
Length of output: 3296
database/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go (4)
7-8: LGTM! Import organization is clean and necessary.
The addition of the database contracts import is required for using the driver constants, and the imports are properly organized.
24-73: LGTM! Test naming follows Go conventions.
The renaming of test methods to include the "Test" prefix follows Go testing conventions, improving clarity and consistency.
34-36: Verify the impact of Columns to Columnize method change.
The change from Columns to Columnize suggests an API change. Let's ensure all callers are updated.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of the old Columns method
rg "\.Columns\(" --type go
# Search for the new Columnize method to verify consistent usage
rg "\.Columnize\(" --type go21-21: Consider adding separate test suites for different drivers.
While the change to use database.DriverPostgres is good for type safety, we might want to ensure comprehensive test coverage across all supported database drivers.
Let's check what other drivers are supported:
Consider creating separate test suites for each supported driver to ensure consistent behavior across different databases.
contracts/database/schema/blueprint.go (2)
8-9: LGTM! Verify usage consistency across the codebase.
The method signature and documentation are well-defined. Let's verify its implementation and usage across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
✓ Method is correctly implemented and consistently used
The verification shows that BigIncrements is:
- Properly implemented in
database/schema/blueprint.gousingUnsignedBigInteger(column).AutoIncrement() - Used consistently in migrations and tests
- Has proper test coverage in
blueprint_test.go - Correctly mocked for testing purposes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check implementation and usage patterns of BigIncrements
# Look for implementation and usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(b $_) ColumnDefinition {
$$$
BigIncrements($$$)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BigIncrements usage in Go files
rg "BigIncrements" -t go -A 3 -B 3
# Also search for any implementation of the Blueprint interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) BigIncrements(column string) ColumnDefinition {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5884
42-43: Enhance documentation and verify implementation consistency.
The documentation could be more helpful by specifying the exact size range for unsigned big integers.
-// UnsignedBigInteger Create a new unsigned big integer (8-byte) column on the table.
+// UnsignedBigInteger Create a new unsigned big integer (8-byte) column on the table.
+// The column type is UNSIGNED BIGINT, which allows values from 0 to 2^64-1.✅ Verification successful
Documentation enhancement approved with implementation verification
The implementation in database/schema/blueprint.go shows that UnsignedBigInteger is correctly implemented by composing BigInteger(column).Unsigned(). The test case in database/schema/blueprint_test.go confirms it creates a column with bigInteger type and unsigned: true. The suggested documentation enhancement is appropriate and helpful for developers.
- The implementation is consistent across the codebase
- Test coverage exists and verifies the correct behavior
- The proposed documentation addition provides valuable information about the value range
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent implementation of unsigned big integer columns
# Look for implementation patterns to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(b $_) ColumnDefinition {
$$$
UnsignedBigInteger($$$)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the implementation of UnsignedBigInteger in the codebase
rg -A 5 "UnsignedBigInteger" --type go
# Also search for any test cases or usages
rg "UnsignedBigInteger\(" --type go
# Look for related column type definitions
rg "UNSIGNED.*BIGINT" --type go -i
Length of output: 7533
contracts/database/schema/grammar.go (2)
31-31: LGTM! Verify interface implementations for CompileViews.
The addition of the database parameter aligns with the changes to CompileTables and maintains consistency in the interface.
Let's verify all implementations of this interface method:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all implementations of CompileViews to ensure they've been updated
# with the new signature
# Search for struct types implementing Grammar interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) CompileViews'
# Also search for any potentially missed implementations
rg -A 2 "CompileViews\(\)"27-27: LGTM! Verify interface implementations for CompileTables.
The addition of the database parameter is a good enhancement that supports multi-database setups and database-specific SQL syntax.
Let's verify all implementations of this interface method:
✅ Verification successful
All CompileTables implementations have been properly updated
The verification shows that all implementations of CompileTables have been correctly updated to include the database string parameter:
mocks/database/schema/Grammar.go: Mock implementation updateddatabase/schema/grammars/postgres.go: Postgres implementation updateddatabase/schema/grammars/sqlite.go: SQLite implementation updateddatabase/schema/grammars/mysql.go: MySQL implementation updated
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all implementations of CompileTables to ensure they've been updated
# with the new signature
# Search for struct types implementing Grammar interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) CompileTables'
# Also search for any potentially missed implementations
rg -A 2 "CompileTables\(\)"
Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find implementations
# Find all Go files that might contain Grammar implementations
fd -e go | xargs rg -l "CompileTables"
# Then search for the actual implementations with context
rg "func.*CompileTables" -A 2
# Also search for interface implementation patterns
rg "type.*struct.*Grammar"
Length of output: 2469
database/schema/grammars/wrap.go (4)
6-12: LGTM: Clean addition of driver support
The addition of the driver field and its contract import enables proper dialect-specific behavior handling.
30-36:
Breaking Change: Columns method now returns []string
This is a breaking change that modifies the return type from string to []string. While this change enables more flexible column handling, it requires updates to all callers.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all Columns method calls to identify affected code
ast-grep --pattern '$_.Columns($$$)'80-82: LGTM: Proper MySQL identifier quoting
The implementation correctly handles MySQL's backtick identifier quoting and properly escapes existing backticks.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that backticks are used in various contexts across the codebase, but most importantly, they reveal the MySQL-specific identifier quoting implementation in database/schema/grammars/wrap.go. The implementation correctly handles:
- MySQL-specific backtick quoting with proper escaping of existing backticks
- Different quoting for other drivers (double quotes)
The review comment's concern about MySQL identifier quoting is valid and the implementation is correct. Let me generate the final response:
Verified: MySQL identifier quoting implementation is correct
The implementation properly handles MySQL's backtick identifier quoting by:
- Using backticks for MySQL driver specifically
- Properly escaping existing backticks by doubling them
- Using standard double quotes for other database drivers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential edge cases in identifier names
rg -g '*.go' '`[^`]+`' --type go
Length of output: 31119
15-19: Verify constructor usage across the codebase
The constructor changes look good, but we should verify all callers have been updated with the new driver parameter.
✅ Verification successful
Constructor changes are properly propagated across the codebase
All instances of NewWrap constructor calls have been updated with the correct driver parameter:
database/schema/grammars/postgres.go: Usingcontractsdatabase.DriverPostgresdatabase/schema/grammars/mysql.go: Usingcontractsdatabase.DriverMysqldatabase/schema/grammars/sqlite.go: Usingcontractsdatabase.DriverSqlitedatabase/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go: Usingdatabase.DriverPostgresin test
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all NewWrap constructor calls to ensure they're updated
ast-grep --pattern 'NewWrap($$$)'
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NewWrap constructor calls using ripgrep for better pattern matching
rg "NewWrap\(" -A 2
Length of output: 1206
support/docker/mysql.go (1)
100-102: Add a comment explaining the foreign key check disable.
While the implementation is correct, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining why foreign key checks need to be disabled during table drops. This helps future maintainers understand the purpose of this operation.
Let's verify if this pattern is consistently implemented across other database operations:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about how these foreign key checks are used in the schema operations.
Let me check how these grammar methods are being used in the schema operations to understand the complete flow.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
The foreign key check handling is correctly implemented and follows the framework's pattern.
The implementation in support/docker/mysql.go follows the established pattern used throughout the framework:
- The schema grammar (
database/schema/grammars/mysql.go) defines the foreign key check operations - The MySQL schema implementation (
database/schema/mysql_schema.go) uses these operations when dropping tables - The pattern is consistently used in database operations that require table drops, such as migrations and database wipes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of foreign key check handling
rg -A 2 "FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS" --type go
# Look for similar table drop operations
ast-grep --pattern 'drop table'
Length of output: 818
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the context around foreign key checks in schema grammars
rg -B 5 -A 5 "FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS" database/schema/grammars/mysql.go
# Find where these grammar methods are being used
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_) Grammar {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 909
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find usages of CompileDisableForeignKeyConstraints and CompileEnableForeignKeyConstraints
rg -B 3 -A 3 "CompileDisableForeignKeyConstraints|CompileEnableForeignKeyConstraints" --type go
# Look for the schema operations that might be using these methods
rg -B 3 -A 3 "Fresh|DropAllTables" --type go
Length of output: 45013
database/orm/orm.go (2)
6-6: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate
The fmt import is correctly placed and necessary for string formatting in the new DatabaseName() method.
93-95: LGTM with verification suggestion
The implementation is clean and follows the existing patterns in the codebase. However, let's verify the config key existence to ensure robust error handling.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show consistent usage of the database.connections.{connection}.database config key pattern across the codebase, particularly in test files that mock this exact behavior. The pattern is used in both production code (database/orm/orm.go, database/db/config_builder.go) and test files, with proper mocking and expectations set up.
Let's verify the config initialization to ensure the key is properly set:
Let's try a different approach to check the config structure and validation:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response as we have sufficient evidence about the database configuration handling in the codebase:
Implementation is safe and follows established patterns
The DatabaseName() method follows the codebase's standard approach for database configuration:
- The config key pattern
database.connections.{connection}.databaseis consistently used throughout the codebase - The framework has proper error handling for missing database configs (
OrmDatabaseConfigNotFounderror) - Config validation happens during connection setup, before this method is called
- Similar config retrieval patterns are well-tested across multiple test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the database config key pattern usage across the codebase
# Expected: Find similar patterns to confirm this is the standard approach
# Check for similar config key patterns
rg "database\.connections\.[^.]+\.database" --type go
# Look for any error handling around config.GetString
ast-grep --pattern 'config.GetString($$$)'
Length of output: 2400
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check config initialization and default values
rg -A 5 "database\.connections.*=.*" --type go
# Look for config validation or existence checks
rg "database\.connections.*\b(exists|has|check)" --type go
Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for config file definitions or database config setup
rg -l "database.*connections" --type yaml --type json --type toml
# Check for any database config validation or setup in Go files
rg -B 2 -A 2 "database.*config" --type go
# Look specifically for connection setup code
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(config $_, connection string) $$ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5464
database/schema/schema.go (1)
48-50: LGTM! Implementation follows established patterns.
The MySQL driver implementation follows the same pattern as other drivers, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
Let's verify the implementation of the referenced types:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the Grammar interface implementation with one more script to ensure completeness:
Let's check the actual implementation of MySQL grammar methods with a different pattern:
Let's try one final verification with a more general pattern:
Implementation verified and properly follows the interface contract
The MySQL implementation is complete and correctly structured:
MysqlSchemaproperly embedsCommonSchemaand includes necessary fieldsMysqlgrammar implements all required methods from theGrammarinterface including:- Table operations (Create, Drop, Foreign Keys)
- Column type definitions (Integer, BigInteger, String)
- Schema information queries (Tables, Views, Indexes)
- Constraint management methods
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of MySQL-related types and interfaces
# Check if NewMysql grammar implements the Grammar interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type Mysql struct {
$$$
}'
# Check if MysqlSchema implements the DriverSchema interface
ast-grep --pattern 'type MysqlSchema struct {
$$$
}'
# Verify NewMysqlSchema constructor
ast-grep --pattern 'func NewMysqlSchema($$$) $$$'
Length of output: 1676
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Grammar interface definition and MySQL implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'type Grammar interface {
$$$
}'
# Check MySQL grammar methods
ast-grep --pattern 'func (mysql *Mysql) $$$($$$) $$$'
Length of output: 3573
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check MySQL grammar implementation in the specific file
rg -A 1 "func \(mysql \*Mysql\)" database/schema/grammars/mysql.go
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for method implementations in mysql.go with more context
rg -A 2 "^func.*Mysql" database/schema/grammars/mysql.go
# Also check the constructor
rg -A 2 "^func New.*Mysql" database/schema/grammars/mysql.go
Length of output: 4039
database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go (2)
84-84: Verify column name formatting changes
The switch from Columns to Columnize across multiple SQL generation methods suggests a standardization of column name handling. Please ensure this change maintains proper escaping and formatting of column names, especially for edge cases with special characters or reserved words.
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of both methods to understand the difference
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x *Wrap) Columnize($_) string'
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x *Wrap) Columns($_) string'Also applies to: 181-181, 205-207
25-25: Verify driver-specific behavior initialization
The change to include contractsdatabase.DriverSqlite in NewWrap suggests a new driver-aware wrapping mechanism. This is good for consistency across different database drivers.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response. The results show that:
- The
NewWrapfunction is consistently used across all database grammar implementations (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite) with their respective driver types. - The
Wrapstruct is properly defined with driver and tablePrefix fields. - All grammar implementations follow the same pattern of initialization.
Driver-specific initialization is correctly implemented
The change to include contractsdatabase.DriverSqlite in NewWrap is consistent with the codebase's pattern. All database grammar implementations (MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite) properly initialize their Wrap instances with their respective driver types, ensuring consistent driver-aware behavior across the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other grammar implementations follow the same pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'NewWrap($_, $_)'
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to find NewWrap usage
rg "NewWrap\(" -A 2
# Also search for any Wrap-related type definitions and initializations
rg "type.*Wrap" -A 2
# And check for driver-specific implementations
fd "grammar" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 29163
database/schema/grammars/postgres.go (2)
24-24: LGTM: Good use of driver type constant
The change to use contractsdatabase.DriverPostgres constant improves type safety and consistency across different database implementations.
67-67: Verify SQL syntax with new Columnize method
The switch from Columns to Columnize affects multiple SQL generation methods. Let's verify that the generated SQL maintains proper syntax and escaping.
Also applies to: 69-69, 90-90, 113-113
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify this change.
Based on the output, I can now generate the final response as we have enough information about the implementation and usage.
The change from Columns to Columnize is safe and maintains proper SQL syntax
Looking at the implementation in wrap.go, Columnize actually uses Columns internally:
func (r *Wrap) Columnize(columns []string) string {
columns = r.Columns(columns)
}This is a safe refactoring where:
- The method is consistently used across MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite grammars
- Test coverage exists in
wrap_test.goverifying proper column formatting and escaping - The change maintains proper SQL syntax as it's just a wrapper around the existing
Columnsmethod
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the Columnize method maintains proper SQL syntax
# Look for any existing tests that verify the SQL generation
# Search for tests that verify SQL generation
echo "Searching for relevant test cases..."
rg -l "TestPostgres.*SQL" --type go
# Look for example usage of Columnize
echo "Checking Columnize implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($w *Wrap) Columnize($_) $_'
Length of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the Wrap type definition and its methods
echo "Searching for Wrap type and methods..."
rg -A 10 "type Wrap struct" --type go
# Search for tests related to PostgreSQL schema
echo "Searching for PostgreSQL schema tests..."
rg -l "TestPostgres.*Schema" --type go
# Look for actual usage of Columnize in tests
echo "Checking Columnize usage in tests..."
rg "Columnize\(" --type go -A 2
# Find the old Columns method for comparison
echo "Finding old Columns method..."
rg "func.*Columns\(" --type go -A 2
Length of output: 7514
database/schema/schema_test.go (1)
117-117: LGTM: Appropriate use of BigInteger for foreign key
The change from Integer to BigInteger for foreign keys aligns with best practices and the new Blueprint interface methods.
contracts/database/orm/orm.go (1)
17-18: LGTM! Verify implementation consistency.
The addition of DatabaseName() method is well-documented and properly placed in the interface. This is a necessary addition for MySQL-specific operations, particularly for table and view management.
Let's verify the implementation consistency across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified and consistent across the codebase
The DatabaseName() method is properly implemented and used:
- Main implementation in
database/orm/orm.goretrieves database name from config - Used correctly in schema operations:
mysql_schema.gofor compiling indexescommon_schema.gofor compiling tables and views
- Mock implementation present for testing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of DatabaseName() method
# Check for interface implementations
echo "Checking for DatabaseName() implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($v *$t) DatabaseName() string {
$$$
}'
# Check for method usage
echo "Checking for DatabaseName() usage:"
rg 'DatabaseName\(\)' -A 2
Length of output: 1679
database/schema/grammars/mysql_test.go (2)
1-11: LGTM: Well-structured package and imports
The package structure follows Go best practices with clear separation of contracts and mocks.
1-305: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite
The test suite provides good coverage of MySQL grammar functionality with proper use of mocks and test patterns. While there are opportunities for improvement in test structure and maintainability, the implementation is solid and follows testing best practices.
database/schema/grammars/mysql.go (1)
5-5: Check compatibility of slices package with Go version
The slices package is imported, which is available in the Go standard library starting from Go 1.21. Ensure that the Go version used supports the slices package. If targeting earlier Go versions, consider importing golang.org/x/exp/slices or using alternative implementations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
database/schema/grammars/mysql_test.go (2)
48-75: Update comments to reflect MySQL instead of PostgreSQLThe inline comments in
TestCompileCreatereferencepostgres.go, which may cause confusion since this is a MySQL test. Please update the comments to accurately reflectmysql.go.Apply the following diff to correct the comments:
- // postgres.go::CompileCreate + // mysql.go::CompileCreate ... - // postgres.go::TypeInteger + // mysql.go::TypeInteger ... - // postgres.go::ModifyDefault + // mysql.go::ModifyDefault ... - // postgres.go::ModifyIncrement + // mysql.go::ModifyIncrement ... - // postgres.go::ModifyNullable + // mysql.go::ModifyNullable
212-228: Update comments to reflect MySQL instead of PostgreSQLIn the
TestGetColumnsfunction, several comments referencepostgres.go, which could be misleading. Please update these comments to refer tomysql.goto maintain consistency and clarity.Apply the following diff:
- // utils.go::getColumns + // utils.go::getColumns ... - // postgres.go::ModifyDefault + // mysql.go::ModifyDefault ... - // postgres.go::ModifyNullable + // mysql.go::ModifyNullable ... - // postgres.go::ModifyIncrement + // mysql.go::ModifyIncrement
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
database/schema/grammars/mysql.go(1 hunks)database/schema/grammars/mysql_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/processors/mysql_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/schema_test.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- database/schema/grammars/mysql.go
- database/schema/processors/mysql_test.go
- database/schema/schema_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
database/schema/grammars/mysql_test.go (2)
25-41: Refactor TestCompileAdd using table-driven tests for consistency
The TestCompileAdd function could benefit from a table-driven test approach, similar to other tests in this file like TestCompileForeign and TestModifyDefault. This would enhance readability and make it easier to extend test cases in the future.
232-270: Verify all test cases in TestModifyDefault assert expected SQL output
In TestModifyDefault, the first test case named "without change and default is nil" does not have an expectSql value. Please ensure that all test cases include assertions to validate the SQL output, improving the effectiveness of the tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
database/schema/schema_test.go (2)
151-157: Consider improving the primary key index verification structureWhile the current implementation works, consider these improvements for better maintainability:
- The comment about SQLite should be moved closer to its relevant code section
- Consider using a map of driver-specific index names for better scalability
-// SQLite does not support set primary index separately -if driver == database.DriverPostgres { - s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, "goravel_primaries_pkey")) -} -if driver == database.DriverMysql { - s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, "primary")) -} +// Define expected primary key index names per driver +primaryKeyNames := map[database.Driver]string{ + database.DriverPostgres: "goravel_primaries_pkey", + database.DriverMysql: "primary", +} + +// SQLite does not support set primary index separately +if expectedName, ok := primaryKeyNames[driver]; ok { + s.Require().True(schema.HasIndex(table, expectedName)) +}
Line range hint
94-99: Track implementation of pending featuresThere are several TODO comments and commented-out test code sections that need attention:
- Implementation of type operations (TestDropAllTypes)
- Implementation of view operations (TestDropAllViews)
- Commented column testing code in TestTable_GetTables
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these pending implementations?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
database/schema/schema_test.go(3 hunks)support/docker/mysql.go(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- support/docker/mysql.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
database/schema/schema_test.go (2)
38-46: LGTM: MySQL driver setup is properly implemented
The MySQL driver initialization follows the established pattern, with appropriate error handling for Docker readiness checks.
127-127: LGTM: Good choice using BigInteger for foreign key
Using BigInteger for foreign keys is a better practice as it provides more headroom for growth and matches the typical primary key type in modern applications.
📑 Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Blueprintinterface, includingBigIncrements,BigInteger, andUnsignedBigInteger.DatabaseNamemethod to retrieve the current database name.MysqlSchemastruct for managing MySQL database schemas, including methods for dropping tables and views.Wrapstruct with a newColumnizemethod and driver-specific behavior for SQL command generation.CommonSchemamethods to include database context for table and view compilation.Bug Fixes
Freshmethod for managing foreign key checks during table drops.Tests
ProcessIndexesmethod in theMysqlprocessor to ensure correct index handling.SchemaSuitetest suite to focus on MySQL driver testing.✅ Checks