Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: [#450] The image rule of validation is wrong #67

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl commented Jul 2, 2024

πŸ“‘ Description

Closes goravel/goravel#450

βœ… Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced configuration settings for Renovate in renovate.json for better dependency management.
    • Added methods for FileImageJson struct to enhance file handling capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and validation logic in the ContextRequest validation method.
  • Chores

    • Updated go.mod dependencies for better compatibility and performance.
    • Renamed CI job from test to ubuntu and adjusted Go version matrix in workflow configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent code changes encompass several updates across multiple files. The key modifications involve renaming a job in a GitHub Actions workflow, enhancing the validation logic in the ContextRequest struct, updating dependency versions in go.mod, configuring Renovate for dependency management, and adding new validation structures and methods in route tests.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Renamed job from test to ubuntu; updated matrix config with Go versions 1.21, 1.22.
context_request.go Refactored Validate method: direct options usage, error handling in data retrieval, updated validation logic.
go.mod Updated dependency versions: goravel/framework v1.14.1 to v1.14.2; pgx v5.5.4 to v5.5.5, etc.
renovate.json Added new configuration settings for automerging non-major updates with Renovate.
route_test.go Added import for mime/multipart, new FileImageJson struct, and associated validation methods.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No diagrams are necessary as the changes are too varied and not focused on specific feature control flows.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #) Addressed Explanation
Fix the image and file validation rule error (#450) βœ… Addressed by refactoring validation logic in ContextRequest struct.

Tip

AI model upgrade

gpt-4o model for reviews and chat is now live

OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. Please join our Discord Community to provide any feedback or to report any issues.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl changed the title fix:[#450] The image rule of validation is wrong fix: [#450] The image rule of validation is wrong Jul 3, 2024
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2024 10:22
@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 3, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Actions performed

Comments resolved.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 3, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 014b541 and 311f5b7.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • logo.png is excluded by !**/*.png
Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • context_request.go (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (4 hunks)
  • renovate.json (1 hunks)
  • route_test.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • go.mod
  • renovate.json
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

8-8: LGTM! But verify references to the old job name.

The job name has been changed from test to ubuntu, and the matrix configuration has been expanded to include Go versions 1.21 and 1.22.

However, ensure that no other parts of the CI/CD pipeline are referencing the old job name test.

Verification successful

No references to the old job name test found in the CI/CD pipeline configuration.

The reference found in README.md is unrelated to the workflow job name change and does not impact the pipeline.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no references to the old job name `test`.

# Test: Search for the old job name. Expect: No references to `test`.
rg --type yaml $'test:'

Length of output: 171



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no references to the old job name `test`.

# Test: Search for the old job name without the type filter and with debug information.
rg --debug test:

Length of output: 2450



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no references to the old job name `test`.

# Test: Search for the old job name including hidden files and directories.
rg --hidden test:

Length of output: 60

context_request.go (2)

393-393: LGTM!

The validation logic has been simplified by directly calling r.validation.Make.


372-375: Ensure proper error handling.

The error handling for data retrieval has been improved, but make sure that all possible error scenarios are covered.

Verification successful

Ensure proper error handling.

The Validate method comprehensively handles errors for various scenarios, including empty rules, data retrieval, and setting data in dataFace. The error handling is thorough and ensures prompt reporting of issues.

  • context_request.go:367: Handles empty rules.
  • context_request.go:373: Handles errors from validate.FromRequest.
  • context_request.go:379, context_request.go:387: Handle errors from dataFace.Set.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling in the `Validate` method.

# Test: Search for all error handling code in the `Validate` method. Expect: Comprehensive error handling.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (r *ContextRequest) Validate($_, $_) ($_, $_) {
  $$$
  if err != nil {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 129



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the `Validate` method from `context_request.go` to review error handling.

# Locate the file
file=$(fd context_request.go)

# Extract the `Validate` method
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (r *ContextRequest) Validate($_, $_) ($_, $_) {
  $$$
}' $file

Length of output: 1727

route_test.go (2)

444-449: LGTM!

The new FileImageJson struct with fields Name, File, Image, and Json looks good.


451-474: LGTM!

The methods Authorize, Rules, Messages, Attributes, and PrepareForValidation for the FileImageJson struct look good.

context_request.go Show resolved Hide resolved
context_request.go Show resolved Hide resolved
route_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 3, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Actions performed

Comments resolved.

Copy link
Member

@devhaozi devhaozi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl merged commit b67c4f1 into master Jul 3, 2024
7 checks passed
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl deleted the bowen/#450 branch July 3, 2024 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

πŸ› [Bug] The image rule of validation is wrong
2 participants