[DFC-661]: Remove the Beta Banner from Strategic App view

[SophiaDWokoma]

What

Implemented conditional rendering of the beta banner in the base.njk file to ensure it is only visible in web view. Also, added integration tests to verify the functionality.

How to review

1. Code Review
2. Set DEFAULT_CHANNEL in a local frontend .env file to either 'web' or 'strategic_app' and start the application.
3. Verify if the beta banner correctly shows or hides based on the selected view.

Checklist

• Performance analyst has been notified of the change.

• A UCD review has been performed.

• Any necessary changes to the acceptance tests have been made.

Related PRs

DFC-661

[di-aholme]

Internal sign off done - works locally as expected. Ready for handover to auth team

[Joanneyoung01]

Tested and verified locally - LGTM

[gtvj]

Hi @SophiaDWokoma 👋🏽

Thank you for your work on this. I haven't yet reviewed the code or PR, but it seems but it seems some of the comments I've provided on #2114 (review) might be relevant here too. Would you be OK to look into these?

[gtvj]

Hi @SophiaDWokoma - thanks for your recent comment (and apologies that I'd started the thread in the wrong PR, I'd been doing a lot of context switching). I have moved the comment to the right place now and provided a bit more context.

We tend to avoid using "squash and merge" because it loses information that might be useful to future developers.

[gtvj]

Hi @SophiaDWokoma - I've made just a couple of suggestions on this PR relating to the way tests are described.

Like #2114, my sense is that the commits for this PR would benefit from being brought in line with The GDS Way - Working with Git guidance that I shared previously. There are four commits currently and, given this is a single step (i.e. hiding the phase banner), I'd have thought this would would probably be appropriate to include in a single commit.

[SophiaDWokoma]

Hi @SophiaDWokoma - I've made just a couple of suggestions on this PR relating to the way tests are described.

Like #2114, my sense is that the commits for this PR would benefit from being brought in line with The GDS Way - Working with Git guidance that I shared previously. There are four commits currently and, given this is a single step (i.e. hiding the phase banner), I'd have thought this would would probably be appropriate to include in a single commit.

Ok I have used fixup to clean up the commit history and combine the commits.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud