Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trying to pass OLM CI #1387

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 3, 2024
Merged

Trying to pass OLM CI #1387

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 3, 2024

Conversation

NissesSenap
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Edvin Norling <edvin.norling@kognic.com>
Signed-off-by: Edvin Norling <edvin.norling@kognic.com>
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
properties:
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems like olm.maxOpenShiftVersion is not the same as com.redhat.openshift.versions: "v4.6-v4.8"
I guess i missunderstood the docs https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.8/operators/operator_sdk/osdk-working-bundle-images.html
I will play with this later

@NissesSenap
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-operator#2562 I think I have managed to find a "good" way of getting these annotations in order.

@NissesSenap
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looks like the new CI stuff passed in redhat-openshift-ecosystem/community-operators-prod#3915 at least. So I think this should be ready to go, from a OLM yaml point of view

@HVBE HVBE merged commit 721edbe into grafana:master Feb 3, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants