Fix grpc any.proto marshal error

[Flowersea]

Fix grpc any.proto marshal error

Closes #2447

[oleiade]

Hi @Flowersea,

Thanks a lot for the contribution 🙇🏻

I'm not too familiar myself with gRPC nor with this specific part of the codebase yet. From what I read in #2447, it seems somewhat possible to reproduce this easily, thus, would it be possible to write unit tests for it without too much hassle involved?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2523 (7f823f0) into master (42f2e60) will increase coverage by 2.87%.
The diff coverage is 66.97%.

❗ Current head 7f823f0 differs from pull request most recent head b2d3daa. Consider uploading reports for the commit b2d3daa to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2523      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.71%   75.59%   +2.87%     
==========================================
  Files         184      202      +18     
  Lines       14571    15992    +1421     
==========================================
+ Hits        10596    12089    +1493     
+ Misses       3333     3151     -182     
- Partials      642      752     +110     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ubuntu	75.39% <66.97%> (+2.74%)	⬆️
windows	75.29% <66.71%> (+2.91%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/common/context.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
api/v1/client/client.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/v1/client/metrics.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/v1/client/status.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/v1/group.go	54.05% <ø> (-35.01%)	⬇️
api/v1/metric.go	68.18% <ø> (-31.82%)	⬇️
api/v1/routes.go	55.31% <ø> (ø)
api/v1/status.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
cmd/login_cloud.go	19.76% <0.00%> (+19.76%)	⬆️
cmd/login_influxdb.go	11.66% <0.00%> (+11.66%)	⬆️
... and 246 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ab41a1...b2d3daa. Read the comment docs.

[Flowersea]

Hi @Flowersea,

Thanks a lot for the contribution 🙇🏻

I'm not too familiar myself with gRPC nor with this specific part of the codebase yet. From what I read in #2447, it seems somewhat possible to reproduce this easily, thus, would it be possible to write unit tests for it without too much hassle involved?

OK, I will write unit tests later.

[oleiade]

Thanks @Flowersea much appreciated 🙇🏻

[oleiade]

LGTM, thanks @Flowersea 🙇🏻

[olegbespalov]

LGTM! @Flowersea, thanks for your contribution! 🙇