Upgrade Prometheus and Cortex to LabelNames() with matchers versions
#4049
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
This bumps prometheus up to the changes from prometheus/prometheus#9083 and Cortex to cortexproject/cortex#4380 Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
colega
force-pushed
the
upgrade-prometheus-and-cortex
branch
from
100b6cd
to
25b0a42
Compare
|
Rebased on latest |
dannykopping
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This bumps prometheus up to the changes from prometheus/prometheus#9083 and Cortex to cortexproject/cortex#4380
Those changes made a breaking change in the
LabelQuerier'sLabelNamesinterface adding a slice of matchers, just likeLabelValuesalready did. This isn't yet needed in Loki, but it's preventing us from smoothly upgrading further.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None, AFAIK.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist