Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add comparsion with EFK/ELK #624

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ A Loki-based logging stack consists of 3 components:
Loki is like Prometheus, but for logs: we prefer a multidimensional label-based approach to indexing, and want a single-binary, easy to operate system with no dependencies.
Loki differs from Prometheus by focussing on logs instead of metrics, and delivering logs via push, instead of pull.

This stack is lightweight, can be used as a simple alternative to super-heavy and full-featured search stacks such as ELK or EFK:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great stuff but I don't know if we want this on the front page. I defer to @tomwilkie on this one.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wait for feedback ;)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Kuqd @tomwilkie any update?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- compared with elasticsearch, loki is not based on Lucene, with Golang language, it is easier to add new feature and cost less resources(whatever cpu or memory).
- compared with logstash, promtail is not C/S architecture, it directly gathers logs and push to loki.
- compared with fluentd, promtail does not use plugins but scrape configs to handle different log sources and output which mean you do not need to learn ruby and fluentd plguin standard.
- compared with kibana, grafana is a more common open platform for beautiful analytics and monitoring. It supports dozens of databases, natively.

## Getting started

The [getting started docs](./production/README.md) have instructions on how to install Loki via Docker images, Helm charts, Jsonnet, or from source.
Expand Down