Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: clarify ingester_stream_chunks_when_using_blocks setting #5838

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

pracucci
Copy link
Collaborator

What this PR does

After an internal conversation at Grafana Labs, we realised there's some misunderstanding around the ingester_stream_chunks_when_using_blocks note in the doc. In this PR I'm rephrasing based on a feedback received from @bboreham.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes or relates to

N/A

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

@pracucci pracucci marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2023 03:56
@pracucci pracucci requested review from a team as code owners August 28, 2023 03:56
Copy link
Contributor

@charleskorn charleskorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pracucci pracucci enabled auto-merge (squash) August 28, 2023 10:42
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <marco@pracucci.com>
@pracucci pracucci requested a review from grafanabot as a code owner August 28, 2023 12:26
Co-authored-by: Charles Korn <charleskorn@users.noreply.github.com>
@pracucci pracucci force-pushed the doc-improve-chunk-streaming branch from fe01739 to 7e33309 Compare August 28, 2023 12:26
@pracucci pracucci merged commit da04a9b into main Aug 28, 2023
@pracucci pracucci deleted the doc-improve-chunk-streaming branch August 28, 2023 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants