Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polishing design for User tooltip in Schedules #1290

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Ukochka
Copy link
Contributor

@Ukochka Ukochka commented Feb 3, 2023

What this PR does

Design polishing for Schedules User tooltip and Incident action icons

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated

@Ukochka Ukochka marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2023 14:28
@Ukochka Ukochka requested a review from a team February 3, 2023 14:28
@Ukochka Ukochka added the pr:no public docs Added to a PR that does not require public documentation updates label Feb 3, 2023
Copy link
Member

@teodosii teodosii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approved, just one change needed and 1 question.

@teodosii
Copy link
Member

teodosii commented Feb 6, 2023

Add a quick mention to CHANGELOG as well please. It's worth keeping track of all these changes. Thank you

@Ukochka Ukochka merged commit 89f2220 into dev Feb 6, 2023
@Ukochka Ukochka deleted the design-polishing branch February 6, 2023 14:59
brojd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
# What this PR does
Design polishing for Schedules User tooltip and Incident action icons

## Which issue(s) this PR fixes

## Checklist

- [ ] Tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr:no public docs Added to a PR that does not require public documentation updates
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants