Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC] Batch loads distinct keys with disabled cache. #46

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

leebyron
Copy link
Contributor

Based on conversation from #44

@leebyron leebyron force-pushed the distinct-keys branch 2 times, most recently from 6242cf7 to 67be4f3 Compare September 24, 2016 01:51
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 67be4f3 on distinct-keys into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 67be4f3 on distinct-keys into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 67be4f3 on distinct-keys into * on master*.

leebyron added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2017
Based on discussion in #63, a decision was made to not break existing correct but potentially confusing behavior but instead to clearly document that behavior and illustrate patterns for producing different cache behavior such as per-frame caching.

Closes #63
Closes #46
Closes #44
Closes #34
leebyron added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2017
Based on discussion in #63, a decision was made to not break existing correct but potentially confusing behavior but instead to clearly document that behavior and illustrate patterns for producing different cache behavior such as per-frame caching.

Closes #63
Closes #46
Closes #44
Closes #34
@leebyron leebyron closed this in #72 Feb 4, 2017
leebyron added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2017
Based on discussion in #63, a decision was made to not break existing correct but potentially confusing behavior but instead to clearly document that behavior and illustrate patterns for producing different cache behavior such as per-frame caching.

Closes #63
Closes #46
Closes #44
Closes #34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants