-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide 8/25 status update #90
Conversation
By the way - codeclimate is angry that the list elements 2, 3, and 4 don't start at '1'. I'm not sure why the markdown linter is flagging that. |
review. | ||
|
||
In about a week, we plan to move into the phase where we start to vigorously | ||
discuss this question for each area that the review will cover (currently also |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe instead of "discuss this question" it would be more clear to state something like: "discuss the overarching question" or "discuss the main question" or "discuss the guiding question".
@gwaygenomics tried to make that a bit more clear - success? |
I looked into the markdownlint question a bit - looks like we would have to set Rule MD029 to LGTM |
It's already merged, but I like the status update |
Provide 8/25 status update
By positioning the `body` element, we tell Hypothesis to use it (rather than the document) as the container element for the adder. (See hypothesis/client#487 for more information.) Closes: greenelab#90, hypothesis/client#619
Incorporate a discussion of work to date and provide a set of steps to get new participants up to speed.