Save in your infura bills, aggreate multiple transactions in a single rpc call, with no extra effort
Inspired by 0xsequence/multicall
, It works by wrapping an ethers
provider and overrides the call
method to aggregate supported transactions into a single multicall3 call
npm install multicall-provider
yarn add multicall-provider
pnpm add multicall-provider
- It implements a buffer with a configurable 50ms delay and aggregates all operations received within that window
- Calls targeting different block heights (
blockTags
) are aggregated based on the blockTag - Transactions including
from
,value
orgasPrice
skip aggregation and are forwarded to the underlying provider
const provider = multicallProvider(new providers.JsonRpcProvider(...), {
batchSize: 25, // max amount of transactions per multicall call
timeWindow: 0, // time in ms to wait for new transactions before sending (0 still gets all from current event loop which is probably enough on most cases)
multicall3: '' // multicall3 contract address, only the aggregate3 method is used
})
keep in mind it works as long as there are no await
's between calls
// calls won't be aggregated
const daiDecimals = await dai.decimals()
const daiBalance = await dai.balanceOf('0x507f0daa42b215273b8a063b092ff3b6d27767af')
// will be aggreated into a single rpc call
const [daiDecimals, daiBalance] = await Promise.all([
dai.decimals(),
dai.balanceOf('0x507f0daa42b215273b8a063b092ff3b6d27767af'),
])
// this way works too
const daiDecimals = dai.decimals()
const daiBalance = dai.balanceOf('0x507f0daa42b215273b8a063b092ff3b6d27767af')
const balance = await balancePromise
const supply = await supplyPromise
A util to wrap your wagmi
provider with multicall is under multicall-provider/wagmi
as follows
import { configureChains, createClient, mainnet, WagmiConfig } from 'wagmi'
import { publicProvider } from '@wagmi/core/providers/public'
import { MetaMaskConnector } from '@wagmi/core/connectors/metaMask'
import { multicallProvider } from 'multicall-provider/wagmi'
const { chains, provider } = configureChains([mainnet], [publicProvider()])
const client = createClient({
provider: multicallProvider(provider),
connectors: [new MetaMaskConnector({ chains })],
})
All useContractRead
s will be aggregated, but useContractWrite
s won't
Imagine you're building an app like
const App = () => {
return (
<>
<UserBalance token="dai" />
<UserBalance token="usdc" />
<UserBalance token="usdt" />
</>
)
}
Inside each <UserBalance/>
you have a useContractRead
to fetch the balance of the token.
This app would start by making 3 different rpc calls, you may see how this grows depending on your app.
You could useContractReads
on the parent and pass the balances down.
but what if you also need to use the Dai balance in another place way down the tree?
I mean the closer to the component using the data the better
wrapping your wagmi provider with multicallProvider
, you don't need to worry about that, need to use the Dai balance down the tree? wagmi
will have it cached for you already, because of the first useContractRead
, gg
batchSize
: eth_call has a timeout restriction at node level, if it fails with a node error, consider lowering your batch size, 50 should be fine tho