Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

interop: add a flag to clients to statically configure grpclb #4290

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 26, 2021

Conversation

apolcyn
Copy link
Contributor

@apolcyn apolcyn commented Mar 25, 2021

This is a go analogue of grpc/grpc-java#7957 - grpc/grpc-java#7957 (comment) for more context

@apolcyn apolcyn marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2021 00:55
Copy link
Member

@dfawley dfawley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good but one minor nit.

Comment on lines 188 to 189
opts = append(opts, grpc.WithDisableServiceConfig())
opts = append(opts, grpc.WithDefaultServiceConfig(*serviceConfigJSON))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1-line:

opts = append(opts, grpc.WithDisableServiceConfig(), grpc.WithDefaultServiceConfig(*serviceConfigJSON))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

Thanks for the quick review. If this looks good, can you please merge? I don't have merge permissions on this repo (as noted in other PR)

@dfawley dfawley changed the title Add a flag to interop clients to allow statically configuring grpclb interop: add a flag to clients to statically configure grpclb Mar 26, 2021
@dfawley dfawley merged commit 4a19753 into grpc:master Mar 26, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants