False positive results from my execution

[PanagiotisDrakatos]

@gunnarmorling i have a small problem with my execution and I am wondering in my local PC, it needs only 5 sec to get executed except only the first time which needs 50 sec. Why in the leaderboard result of my implementation is approximately 24 sec?? Here are my specs:

Intel core i9 12900K
Memory DDR5 64GB
Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. Z690 AORUS PRO (U3E1
```)

[gunnarmorling]

Hum, interesting. Do you have any idea why the first run is taking so much longer? Note that as per the rules, there must be no state carried forward between runs, just in case I have missed that during reviewing this entry.

…

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 1:35 PM Panagiotis Drakatos ***@***.***> wrote: i have a small problem with my execution and I am wondering in my local PC, it needs only 5 sec to get executed except only the first time which needs 50 sec. Why in the leaderboard result of my implementation is approximately 24 sec?? Here are my specs: Intel core i9 12900K Memory DDR5 64GB Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. Z690 AORUS PRO (U3E1 ```) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#639>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAG7RHGLGSBZK5J6ZS5IXDYQ6JRFAVCNFSM6AAAAABCPLMUGWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZWGE2DONJZG4> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PanagiotisDrakatos]

@gunnarmorling I don't know why the first run takes so long but I can guarantee that every first run of all other people that i tried who make less than 5 sec takes too long 15-20 sec for example. Could you please check it if possible thanks in advance.

[PanagiotisDrakatos]

@gunnarmorling Basically i will change again the code no need to bother you again i will return back with a new solution :)