Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ScalaSteward: Update sbt from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1 #368

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

📦 Updates org.scala-sbt:sbt from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1

📜 GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scala-sbt", artifactId = "sbt" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.scala-sbt", artifactId = "sbt" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-patch, semver-spec-patch, version-scheme:early-semver, commit-count:1

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #368 (4afc826) into main (99e51f3) will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #368      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.61%   97.73%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          62       61       -1     
  Lines        1253     1236      -17     
  Branches       15       15              
==========================================
- Hits         1223     1208      -15     
+ Misses         30       28       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
spark-2.4.x ?
spark-3.0.x 96.75% <ø> (ø)
spark-3.1.x 97.49% <ø> (ø)
spark-3.2.x 97.71% <ø> (ø)
spark-3.3.x 97.71% <ø> (ø)
spark-3.4.x 97.71% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 99e51f3...4afc826. Read the comment docs.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 30, 2023

:octocat: This is an auto-generated comment created by:

  • Date : 2023-06-30 18:05:18 +0000 (UTC)
  • Workflow : PR comment
  • Job name : create_test_summary_report
  • Run : 5425721779
  • Commit : 4afc826 ScalaSteward: Update sbt from 1.9.0 to 1.9.1
Actor Triggering actor Sender
scala-steward
scala-steward
scala-steward
scala-steward
scala-steward
scala-steward
Triggered by:

Test summary report 📊

Spark version testing
2.4.1 626 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4.2 626 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4.3 626 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4.4 626 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4.5 626 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4.6 627 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4.7 627 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
2.4 627 passed, 1 failed, 2 skipped
3.0.0 678 passed, 2 skipped
3.0.1 678 passed, 2 skipped
3.0.2 678 passed, 2 skipped
3.0 678 passed, 2 skipped
3.1.0 706 passed, 2 skipped
3.1.1 706 passed, 2 skipped
3.1.2 706 passed, 2 skipped
3.1 706 passed, 2 skipped
3.2.0 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.2.1 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.2.2 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.2 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.3.0 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.3.1 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.3 710 passed, 2 skipped
3.4 710 passed, 2 skipped

@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #372.

@scala-steward scala-steward deleted the update/sbt-1.9.1 branch July 10, 2023 18:16
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant